Difference between revisions of "User talk:Devalt Yotosala/Sandbox1/Template:Infobox refiner"

From EVE University Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (→‎Feedback: Clarify a point.)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
:* Maybe a Notes option for stuff that does not fit any of the other options?
 
:* Maybe a Notes option for stuff that does not fit any of the other options?
 
: -- [[User:Evon R'al|Evon R'al]] ([[User talk:Evon R'al|talk]]) 11:50, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
 
: -- [[User:Evon R'al|Evon R'al]] ([[User talk:Evon R'al|talk]]) 11:50, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
 +
 +
::* I think we want the mains, as that's likely to be the name that will serve as the point of contact.
 +
::* My concern with the skills and locations blocks are the potential for how large those could get, hence why I have them set to be collapsed by default. If consensus moves against that, it can be changed.
 +
::* That's the content section, so there's no real restrictions as to what goes in there
 +
::* I, personally, don't think that's necessary. People are here for perfect refining after all, not imperfect refining. Again, if consensus disagrees, I'm happy to add the block.
 +
::* I think that the instructions section would be able to cover that, unless others also disagree.
 +
::--[[User:Devalt Yotosala|Devalt Yotosala]] ([[User talk:Devalt Yotosala|talk]]) 14:23, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:23, 27 July 2022

Feedback

This is the best place to give feedback on the proposed Perfect Refiner Template. Arin Mara (talk) 11:24, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

A few things that poped-up in my mind.
  • Do we want the mains name ore the actual refiners name "on top"?
  • I imagine that when looking for a refiner people will be looking for location first an and skills second, is it wise to have those collapsed then?
  • Nitpicking: Perfect skills are by definition on V, so no need to put that in.(Edit: I meant the V in the content, not the block)
  • There a non perfect refiners on the list now. Do we need a block for the non-perfect skills?
  • Maybe a Notes option for stuff that does not fit any of the other options?
-- Evon R'al (talk) 11:50, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
  • I think we want the mains, as that's likely to be the name that will serve as the point of contact.
  • My concern with the skills and locations blocks are the potential for how large those could get, hence why I have them set to be collapsed by default. If consensus moves against that, it can be changed.
  • That's the content section, so there's no real restrictions as to what goes in there
  • I, personally, don't think that's necessary. People are here for perfect refining after all, not imperfect refining. Again, if consensus disagrees, I'm happy to add the block.
  • I think that the instructions section would be able to cover that, unless others also disagree.
--Devalt Yotosala (talk) 14:23, 27 July 2022 (UTC)