Difference between revisions of "User talk:Devalt Yotosala/Sandbox1/Template:Infobox refiner"
From EVE University Wiki
m (→Feedback: Clarify a point.) |
|||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:* Maybe a Notes option for stuff that does not fit any of the other options? | :* Maybe a Notes option for stuff that does not fit any of the other options? | ||
: -- [[User:Evon R'al|Evon R'al]] ([[User talk:Evon R'al|talk]]) 11:50, 27 July 2022 (UTC) | : -- [[User:Evon R'al|Evon R'al]] ([[User talk:Evon R'al|talk]]) 11:50, 27 July 2022 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::* I think we want the mains, as that's likely to be the name that will serve as the point of contact. | ||
+ | ::* My concern with the skills and locations blocks are the potential for how large those could get, hence why I have them set to be collapsed by default. If consensus moves against that, it can be changed. | ||
+ | ::* That's the content section, so there's no real restrictions as to what goes in there | ||
+ | ::* I, personally, don't think that's necessary. People are here for perfect refining after all, not imperfect refining. Again, if consensus disagrees, I'm happy to add the block. | ||
+ | ::* I think that the instructions section would be able to cover that, unless others also disagree. | ||
+ | ::--[[User:Devalt Yotosala|Devalt Yotosala]] ([[User talk:Devalt Yotosala|talk]]) 14:23, 27 July 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:23, 27 July 2022
Feedback
This is the best place to give feedback on the proposed Perfect Refiner Template. Arin Mara (talk) 11:24, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- A few things that poped-up in my mind.
- Do we want the mains name ore the actual refiners name "on top"?
- I imagine that when looking for a refiner people will be looking for location first an and skills second, is it wise to have those collapsed then?
- Nitpicking: Perfect skills are by definition on V, so no need to put that in.(Edit: I meant the V in the content, not the block)
- There a non perfect refiners on the list now. Do we need a block for the non-perfect skills?
- Maybe a Notes option for stuff that does not fit any of the other options?
- -- Evon R'al (talk) 11:50, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- I think we want the mains, as that's likely to be the name that will serve as the point of contact.
- My concern with the skills and locations blocks are the potential for how large those could get, hence why I have them set to be collapsed by default. If consensus moves against that, it can be changed.
- That's the content section, so there's no real restrictions as to what goes in there
- I, personally, don't think that's necessary. People are here for perfect refining after all, not imperfect refining. Again, if consensus disagrees, I'm happy to add the block.
- I think that the instructions section would be able to cover that, unless others also disagree.
- --Devalt Yotosala (talk) 14:23, 27 July 2022 (UTC)