More actions
Drebin 679 (talk | contribs) |
Private talk with User:Drebin 679 changed my mind: mark pages as Past Content, delete fittings after about a year |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
:::::: Wiki got the {{T|Past content}} template for that, as been used at the other limited time events. --[[User:Evon R'al|Evon R'al]] ([[User talk:Evon R'al|talk]]) 16:28, 12 May 2022 (UTC) | :::::: Wiki got the {{T|Past content}} template for that, as been used at the other limited time events. --[[User:Evon R'al|Evon R'al]] ([[User talk:Evon R'al|talk]]) 16:28, 12 May 2022 (UTC) | ||
::::::: Approve of Evon's comment. Further, these sites can very easily be connected to this event at this point in time, such that it won't be misconstrued as for something more general or something more than it is. For that same reason, I do not see the benefit of pruning ship fittings. The main raison d'etre for removing ship fits - a decision on many occasions I have stated my disapproval over - was that the Uni did not have the capacity to keep fits up to date with the many metas of EVE (which I agree, though I saw what I thought was a task group that could've rectified that). Given that like the sites, the fits will be frozen in their context and purpose, I can't see them ever getting "out of date" in the same way as 2013-era general battleship fits did. [[User:Drebin 679|Drebin 679]] ([[User talk:Drebin 679|talk]]) 02:40, 13 May 2022 (UTC) | ::::::: Approve of Evon's comment. Further, these sites can very easily be connected to this event at this point in time, such that it won't be misconstrued as for something more general or something more than it is. For that same reason, I do not see the benefit of pruning ship fittings. The main raison d'etre for removing ship fits - a decision on many occasions I have stated my disapproval over - was that the Uni did not have the capacity to keep fits up to date with the many metas of EVE (which I agree, though I saw what I thought was a task group that could've rectified that). Given that like the sites, the fits will be frozen in their context and purpose, I can't see them ever getting "out of date" in the same way as 2013-era general battleship fits did. [[User:Drebin 679|Drebin 679]] ([[User talk:Drebin 679|talk]]) 02:40, 13 May 2022 (UTC) | ||
:::::::: Let's not lose sight of our goal: make Wiki pages that will help capsuleers enjoy the Event. After talking to Drebin privately I have made the following decisions: there should be one page for hacking and one page for combat sites; event pages will be marked with {{T|Past content}} after the event ends; fittings on event pages clearly marked as {{T|Past content}} will be kept until next year as they could potentially be used to create fittings for other events. I did say deleted. My mind has been changed (and if I encounter new and more persuasive arguments, I will change my mind again!). This is not the time and place for explaining why I said deleted rather than archived or marked as {{T|Past content}}, but I assure you my intentions were good, true and pure. [[User:Arin Mara|Arin Mara]] ([[User talk:Arin Mara|talk]]) 09:09, 14 May 2022 (UTC) | |||