User:Telinchei: Difference between revisions

Line 71:

==Month-wise activity log==

* 2019 That didn't work! Started playing again, but in a new WH corp. Might guest lecture, we'll see... :)

* 2017 Planned - join PAUTZ PO dept; Teach markets, corp fleet intel 101/lowsec intel 120, and incursions content

*2017 July - rerunning incursions, resubbed for a little while. Certified for bombers and other special crossracial ships.

Line 77:

Line 78:

*2015, August: temporarily dropped corp for HQ incursion running. Will be rejoining mid-September under Fast Track and join NSC/WHC. But a Minnie Incursion alt will have to be sorted out at some stage!

*2015, September: Will be rejoining with intent of teaching.

==Rapid-access Notepad==

(For when I can't find a subpage. 2019)

Geography of EVE

*Galaxy (through Wormhole). Subdivided into regions and constellations, plus the WH sector. Each system gets a security rating defining how concord reacts and encourages/incentivises player behaviour

* Need to cover the different sectors; High, Low particularly.

** point out popular regions, risks of high traffic areas, the hisec donut/ring

** Player market hubs and gank risk??? Is that too advanced?

** Null (NPC/Sov or x2) and WH -- probably have to separate due to length of ramblings and sovereignty familiarity probably not being relevant to newbeans. That actually makes it a lot simpler!

* The problem is trying to separate analysis of space from history of space. These two factors of security-status and popularity/utility don't always align.

* differentiating between probability and what is common or likely to happen. Nothing is certain given just the sec status data.

* consider reviewing seamus's notes. //

@@ Line 71: / Line 71: @@
 ==Month-wise activity log==
+* 2019 That didn't work! Started playing again, but in a new WH corp. Might guest lecture, we'll see... :)
 * 2017 Planned - join PAUTZ PO dept; Teach markets, corp fleet intel 101/lowsec intel 120, and incursions content
 *2017 July - rerunning incursions, resubbed for a little while. Certified for bombers and other special crossracial ships.
@@ Line 77: / Line 78: @@
 *2015, August: temporarily dropped corp for HQ incursion running. Will be rejoining mid-September under Fast Track and join NSC/WHC. But a Minnie Incursion alt will have to be sorted out at some stage!
 *2015, September: Will be rejoining with intent of teaching.
+==Rapid-access Notepad==
+(For when I can't find a subpage. 2019)
+Geography of EVE
+*Galaxy (through Wormhole). Subdivided into regions and constellations, plus the WH sector. Each system gets a security rating defining how concord reacts and encourages/incentivises player behaviour
+* Need to cover the different sectors; High, Low particularly.
+** point out popular regions, risks of high traffic areas, the hisec donut/ring
+** Player market hubs and gank risk??? Is that too advanced?
+** Null (NPC/Sov or x2) and WH -- probably have to separate due to length of ramblings and sovereignty familiarity probably not being relevant to newbeans. That actually makes it a lot simpler!
+* The problem is trying to separate analysis of space from history of space. These two factors of security-status and popularity/utility don't always align.
+* differentiating between probability and what is common or likely to happen. Nothing is certain given just the sec status data.
+* consider reviewing seamus's notes. //