User talk:Devalt Yotosala/Sandbox1/Template:Infobox refiner
From EVE University Wiki
Revision as of 23:40, 27 July 2022 by Devalt Yotosala (talk | contribs)
Feedback
This is the best place to give feedback on the proposed Perfect Refiner Template. Arin Mara (talk) 11:24, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- A few things that poped-up in my mind.
- Do we want the mains name ore the actual refiners name "on top"?
- I imagine that when looking for a refiner people will be looking for location first an and skills second, is it wise to have those collapsed then?
- Nitpicking: Perfect skills are by definition on V, so no need to put that in.(Edit: I meant the V in the content, not the block)
- There a non perfect refiners on the list now. Do we need a block for the non-perfect skills?
- Maybe a Notes option for stuff that does not fit any of the other options?
- -- Evon R'al (talk) 11:50, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- I think we want the mains, as that's likely to be the name that will serve as the point of contact.
- My concern with the skills and locations blocks are the potential for how large those could get, hence why I have them set to be collapsed by default. If consensus moves against that, it can be changed.
- That's the content section, so there's no real restrictions as to what goes in there
- I, personally, don't think that's necessary. People are here for perfect refining after all, not imperfect refining. Again, if consensus disagrees, I'm happy to add the block.
- I think that the instructions section would be able to cover that, unless others also disagree.
- --Devalt Yotosala (talk) 14:23, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- Throwing in some ideas:
- When keeping the main on top maybe rename the Alt Name block to refiner?
- Agree with the large box argument for the Location and Skills, but when they are collapsed a user is forced to open them all to get to the info they are looking for.
- That's why a said "nitpicking" :)
- Agree with that. But the Perfect Refine List has a not insubstantial amount of 'Pretty Good"refiners on it. So management has to say something about that.
- That is a very acceptable solution for me
- --Evon R'al (talk) 14:42, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- Throwing in some ideas:
- Agreed. I'll make the change to refiner.
- It's not particularly different than the existing
{{Infobox coordinator}}where skillset, and potentially playtimes, and{{Infobox Mentors}}where skillset, playtime, and bio are all boxed, because of variable length content. - I think it's preferable for the infobox to focus on Perfect Refining skills. This is a somewhat privileged list, with those on it getting 0% refine at Ivy Structures. Many of those on the "pretty good" list have enough Vs to qualify to be on Perfect Refine, and frankly no one who is using this list to maximize their yield is looking for someone with only IVs.
- --Devalt Yotosala (talk) 23:40, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
