Difference between revisions of "User talk:Hirmuolio Pine"

From EVE University Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Thanks: new section)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
::If each type of site will have its own page then I don't really see a need for a "scan results" page (as the probe scanning interface shows the type of site before showing the name, correct?). – [[User:Noemie_belacqua|Noemie]] [[User_talk:Noemie_belacqua|Belacqua]] 06:34, 3 April 2017 (CDT)
 
::If each type of site will have its own page then I don't really see a need for a "scan results" page (as the probe scanning interface shows the type of site before showing the name, correct?). – [[User:Noemie_belacqua|Noemie]] [[User_talk:Noemie_belacqua|Belacqua]] 06:34, 3 April 2017 (CDT)
 +
 +
== Thanks ==
 +
 +
Hey, glad to see someone else is active. keep up the good work! :) [[User:Telinchei|Telinchei]] <sup>[[User talk:Telinchei|Talk]] &middot; [[Special:Contributions/Telinchei|Contribs]]</sup> 16:53, 24 July 2017 (CDT)

Revision as of 21:53, 24 July 2017

Hi! Since you split off the "combat sites" section from the scan results page, could you trim the information from the former (just leaving a link to combat sites and perhaps a brief summary, if you think it's useful) to avoid duplicating the same information in two places? – Noemie Belacqua 02:00, 3 April 2017 (CDT)

I was thinking that once all sites have their own page (combat, relic+data, gas, ice, ore) that whole Scanning:Scan_Results could go away or alternatively be turned into just a list of sites if someone thinks that is needed. Hirmuolio pine (talk) 03:31, 3 April 2017 (CDT)
If each type of site will have its own page then I don't really see a need for a "scan results" page (as the probe scanning interface shows the type of site before showing the name, correct?). – Noemie Belacqua 06:34, 3 April 2017 (CDT)

Thanks

Hey, glad to see someone else is active. keep up the good work! :) Telinchei Talk · Contribs 16:53, 24 July 2017 (CDT)