Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

User:Antei thantonne: Difference between revisions

1,192 editsJoined 26 March 2013
Line 143: Line 143:
Even though your Overview is set to tag pilots with negative security status, it is '''not''' safe to assume that pilots with positive security status won't aggress you. Low-sec pirates often repair their security status regularly for exactly this reason--to give you the false impression that they are friendly.
Even though your Overview is set to tag pilots with negative security status, it is '''not''' safe to assume that pilots with positive security status won't aggress you. Low-sec pirates often repair their security status regularly for exactly this reason--to give you the false impression that they are friendly.


===Unistas should have combat ships —including tackle, EWAR, and/or damage-dealers— in system.===
===Unistas should have combat ships—including tackle, EWAR, and/or damage-dealers—in system.===
Many of our wartime opponents specialize in high-sec PvP using gate and station mechanics, minimizing their risk by always being able to jump away or dock up. Having WTs aggress us in an asteroid belt represents a unique opportunity for us to kill them, without them being able to play gate and station games.
Many of our wartime opponents specialize in high-sec PvP using gate and station mechanics, minimizing their risk by always being able to jump away or dock up. Having WTs aggress us in an asteroid belt represents a unique opportunity for us to kill them, without them being able to play gate and station games.