Incursion fitting principles: Difference between revisions

Line 354:

|-

! style="background:#222222;" | Slots

| style="background:#222222; text-align:center;" | '''Vanguard''' ''(less tank)'' <ref>~~This should only be used by people who know what they are doing, but currently fly a T1 hull (eg do not have an advanced hull yet). The reasoning for this fit is that in~~ a good fleet with excellent damage projection, with an experienced fleet commander and seasoned logistics, you can usually remove the damage control in favour of more damage mods~~. Note the EM hole in this fit - this substitution is ideally done with high (above-minimum) EM Compensation and/or a Deadspace resistance amplifier~~.</ref>

| style="background:#222222; text-align:center;" | '''Vanguard''' ''(less tank)'' <ref>In a really good fleet with excellent damage projection, with an experienced fleet commander and seasoned logistics, you can usually remove the damage control in favour of more damage mods.</ref>

! style="background:#222222;" | Vanguard

! style="background:#222222;" | Assault

Line 386:

<!--

@@ Line 354: / Line 354: @@
 |-
 ! style="background:#222222;" | <small>Slots</small>
-| style="background:#222222; text-align:center;" | '''Vanguard''' ''(less tank)''<small> <ref>This should only be used by people who know what they are doing, but currently fly a T1 hull (eg do not have an advanced hull yet). The reasoning for this fit is that in a good fleet with excellent damage projection, with an experienced fleet commander and seasoned logistics, you can usually remove the damage control in favour of more damage mods. Note the EM hole in this fit - this substitution is ideally done with high (above-minimum) EM Compensation and/or a Deadspace resistance amplifier.</ref></small>
+| style="background:#222222; text-align:center;" | '''Vanguard''' ''(less tank)''<small> <ref>In a really good fleet with excellent damage projection, with an experienced fleet commander and seasoned logistics, you can usually remove the damage control in favour of more damage mods.</ref></small>
 ! style="background:#222222;" | Vanguard
 ! style="background:#222222;" | Assault
@@ Line 386: / Line 386: @@
 ! nowrap style="background:#001000;" | [[Image:icon_resist_em.png|20px|Electromagnetic resistance]]67,3%[[Image:icon_resist_therm.png|20px|Thermal resistance]]67,8%[[Image:icon_resist_kin.png|20px|Kinetic resistance]]72,8%[[Image:icon_resist_exp.png|20px|Explosive resistance]]77,3%
 ! nowrap style="background:#001000;" | [[Image:icon_resist_em.png|20px|Electromagnetic resistance]]71,4%[[Image:icon_resist_therm.png|20px|Thermal resistance]]71,8%[[Image:icon_resist_kin.png|20px|Kinetic resistance]]76,2%[[Image:icon_resist_exp.png|20px|Explosive resistance]]80,1%
-! nowrap style="background:#001000;" | [[Image:icon_resist_em.png|20px|Electromagnetic resistance]]71,7%[[Image:icon_resist_therm.png|20px|Thermal resistance]]72,2%[[Image:icon_resist_kin.png|20px|Kinetic resistance]]76,8%[[Image:icon_resist_exp.png|20px|Explosive resistance]]80,7%
+! nowrap style="background:#001000;" | [[Image:icon_resist_em.png|20px|Electromagnetic resistance]]71,4%[[Image:icon_resist_therm.png|20px|Thermal resistance]]71,8%[[Image:icon_resist_kin.png|20px|Kinetic resistance]]76,2%[[Image:icon_resist_exp.png|20px|Explosive resistance]]80,1%
 ! nowrap style="background:#001000;" | [[Image:icon_resist_em.png|20px|Electromagnetic resistance]]73,6%[[Image:icon_resist_therm.png|20px|Thermal resistance]]73,8%[[Image:icon_resist_kin.png|20px|Kinetic resistance]]76,2%[[Image:icon_resist_exp.png|20px|Explosive resistance]]80,1%
 <!--