Difference between revisions of "Capacitor warfare"

From EVE University Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Update link.)
 
(230 intermediate revisions by 33 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
[[image:Cuesnosnneut.JPG|650px]] <br>
+
{{Weapon Systems Links}}[[image:Cuesnosnneut.JPG|650px|thumb|400px|Visual effects for Energy Neutralizers (left) and Energy Nosferatus (right)]]
−
or '''''Why These Pictures are Some of the Prettiest Things You Will See in EVE'''''.
+
'''Capacitor warfare''' is the attack strategy of using equipment to drain a target ship's [[capacitor]], its available energy for powered modules. A ship without sufficient capacitor energy can lose the ability to fire certain [[weapons]], actively [[tanking|repair]] itself, use [[propulsion equipment]] or other powered modules, or even [[warp]] to another location.
−
<br>
+
 
−
<br>
+
== Overview ==
−
<br>
+
[[image:Heavyneut.jpg|thumb|Heavy Energy Neutralizer I stats]]
−
This is an ongoing project. Any changes or help will be appreciated and then mutilated, hacked, revised and generally forced into the authors grand vision (ha ha ha).  Once an intial draft is completed (yes this will take months) a thread on the forums will be established for discussion and corrections. Thanks!
+
Capacitor warfare (or "cap warfare") equipment drains capacitor energy from the target ship. Both modules and drones are available and come in multiple types:
−
<br>
+
* [[#Energy Neutralizers|Energy Neutralziers]] ("'''neuts'''") destroy capacitor energy, consuming a large amount from the attacker to nullify a similar amount from the target ship. [''High'' slot, short range]
−
<br>
+
* [[#Energy Nosferatu|Energy Nosferatu]] ("'''vampires'''", "'''NOS'''") siphon a small amount of energy, transferring it from the target to the attacker (with restrictions). [''High'' slot, short range]
−
<br>
+
* [[Drones#Combat Utility Drones|Energy Neutralizer Drones]] - Light, medium, and heavy drones, and a wing of support fighters, based on Amarr combat drones.
−
{| align="right"
+
 
−
| __TOC__
+
Cap warfare modules are fitted into a ship's ''High'' slot, and both types, Neutralizers and Nosferatu, operate at short range. (By contrast, most [[electronic warfare]] modules are ''Mid'' slot modules and operate at mid-range or long-range.) While conventional weapons require a turret or missile launcher ''High'' slot, a capacitor warfare module has no such requirement and can fit into any ''High'' slot.
−
|}
+
 
 +
Ships can resist capacitor warfare by fitting modules with Neutralizer Resistance, such as the [[Cap Battery]]. Also, one ship may transfer capacitor energy to another by using a [[Remote Capacitor Transmitter]].
 +
 
 +
== Limitations ==
 +
Some systems are unaffected by capacitor warfare. Projectile turrets and Missile Launchers do not require capacitor energy to operate. [[Shields]] continue to function and regenerate without capacitor needs, and subspace engines still function. However, a ship with a fully drained capacitor cannot [[warp]] or activate [[propulsion equipment]], severely limiting range control and escape options.
 +
 
 +
== General principles ==
 +
Understanding capacitor warfare requires an understanding of capacitor mechanics. Capacitors are a self-recharging resource measured in gigajoules (GJ), with a [[capacitor recharge rate]] determined both by the specific ship and the percentage level of the capacitor, measured in gigajoules per second (GJ/sec).  The 'peak' recharge rate occurs at 25% capacity, with the recharge rate sharply decreasing below this amount, and more gradually decreasing above it. Therefore, the rate of recharge is lowest when the capacitor is full (100%) or empty (0%). This is the same principle that governs the recharge rate of shields, though the values are slightly different.
 +
 
 +
The goal of capacitor warfare is to use enough neutralization to overcome the peak recharge rate of the target's capacitor, and while capacitors recharge continuously over time, Neutralizers remove capacitor in single large chunks with every module cycle. As a result, the effectiveness of Neutralizers is often expressed in effective GJ/sec to facilitate easier comparison to the target's recharge rate. Capacitor warfare will have the smallest relative effects at around peak recharge, as the amount of capacitor removed will be countered by the highest recharge rate the target's capacitor is capable of. As a result, it is much more difficult to "break" a target by bringing its capacitor below 25% than it is to keep it at 0% once it gets there. (i.e. it may take 3 Neutralizer modules to bring a target below 25%, but only one Neutralizer module to keep it at close to 0.) As such, the common rule of thumb for Neutralizer-focused ships or fleets is to have ''much'' higher neutralization potential than the enemy's conceivable recharge rate.
 +
 
 +
This being said, even without sufficient neutralizers to break a target, neutralizers can still have a meaningful effect on them. A pilot whose ship is hovering at around 30% capacitor needs to start making choices about which capacitor-consuming modules to use or not use, or may need to start using a Cap Booster to keep themselves up. Being forced to choose which modules not to run opens room for mistakes, and may force the target pilot to choose between not performing their role in the fleet, or dying; and Cap Booster charges will eventually run out in a longer fight and result in a slow death by attrition.
 +
 
 +
Like many other Electronic Warfare modules, Capacitor Warfare modules have both Optimal and Falloff ranges. Using modules outside their Optimal range results in reduced effectiveness. The formula for effectiveness loss is the same as Turret falloff:
 +
* at 100% Optimal + 0% Falloff = 100% Effectiveness
 +
* at 100% Optimal + 100% Falloff = ~50% Effectiveness
 +
* at 100% Optimal + 200% Falloff = ~6% Effectiveness
 +
* at 100% Optimal + 300% Falloff, the module shuts down as the target is considered 'out of range'.
  
−
=Capacitor Warfare Overview=
+
Like weapons, capacitor warfare modules benefit from [[overheating]]; as an overheated weapon deals more damage-per-second, an overheated capacitor warfare module sucks the opponent dry faster.
  
−
You have probably heard the phrase 'cap is life' during your time in EVE.  There are many good reasons why this is true, and each one is also a reason why Capacitor Warfare can be extremely effective.  Capacitor directly feeds laser and hybrid turrets, keeps active tanks running, and powers the majority of fighting midslot modules including all EWAR modules and propulsion systems.  An enemy without capacitor is an enemy without options which means you get to dictate the flow of the battle - kill them your way or if something goes wrong you can always be confident that warp jamming requires cap.
+
== Energy Neutralizers ==
−
<br>
+
[[File:Icon energy neutralizer i.png|left]]'''Energy Neutralizers''' ("'''Neuts'''", also formerly called '''Energy Destabilizers''') are the heavy hitters of capacitor warfare, able to remove large amounts of capacitor and leave an enemy capped out faster than any other capacitor warfare system. However, they also require a large amount of capacitor to activate and have a long cycle time. Energy Neutralizers have relatively short ranges, though this range scales with module size to retain effectiveness on larger hulls.
−
<br>
 
−
Cap Warfare is a bit mysterious for some.  Rarely will you see EWAR guides include Cap Warfare even though that is where it rightfully belongs, much like warp jamming.  Capacitor Warfare has had its ups and downs in the history of EVE, with its wild days of overpowered glory, and subsequent 'rebalancing' lows.  It is still and will always be an extremely viable tactic in the sandbox of EVE, and the pendulum will continue to swing back and forth over the impossible 'balanced' ideal, but knowing what and how is extremely important even if you never plan to employ cap warfare yourself.
 
−
<br>
 
−
<br>
 
−
Capacitor Warfare, defined as direct action taken to reduce or elminate the capacitor of a target, can be accomplished a few ways:
 
−
<br>
 
−
*Using one of two types of Engineering Equipment modules
 
−
**Energy Destabilizers - energy neutralizers of various sizes and meta levels
 
−
**Energy Vampires - nosferatu of various sizes and meta levels
 
−
*Using one of three Combat Utility Drones
 
−
**Light, medium and heavy energy neutralizer drones based on Amarr drone models - the Acolyte EV-300, Infiltrator EV-600, and Praetor EV-900
 
−
<br>
 
−
(as an aside if you have ever been curious where the word nosferatu comes from check out this link to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nosferatu Nosferatu])
 
−
<br>
 
−
<br>
 
−
Although focussed on the same goal, each of the these systems has its own strengths and weakneses and each is very different in implementation.  Cap warfare drones are the same as other EWAR drones and share strengths and weaknesses with the TD and SD drones.  Alternatively the modules are very different from other EWAR modules.  They fit like weapons rather than EWAR modules, in high slots with three sizes corresponding to hull size, competing for fitting slots with DPS and high slot utility rather than mid slot tank and utility.  Compared to other EWAR modules they have short ranges and kill capacitors incrementally in the same way that DPS destroys shields.  Much like TD, cap warfare has setups against which it is inherrently limited. As an example, a passive tanked drake will still be able to tank and DPS with 0 capacitor (it won't be able to use any active hardners, warp jamming, or propulsion modules though!).  Cap Boosters are the natural counter to capacitor warfare as they inject capacitor charges which will nullify, mitigate, or enhance recovery from cap warfare just as a shield booster will counter DPS.
 
−
<br>
 
−
<br>
 
−
Capacitors are a common thread for every single ship in EVE.  The same can't even be said for module slots.  Every engagement, PvP or PvE, will involve cap.  Cap to get there, cap to keep someone there, cap to tank, cap to kill, cap stable or capped out, cap is life.  Therefore whether you are planning, fitting, or undocking, countering or using capacitor warfare is something which needs to be considered.
 
−
<br>
 
−
<br>
 
−
And that is the basics.  Keep reading for how it works, what ships it works best with and how to make it work for you.
 
−
<br>
 
−
<br>
 
−
<br>
 
  
−
=How Destabilizers, Vampires, and Neutralizer Drones Work=
+
All neutralizers have a similar set of attributes. The different sizes of neutralizer differ significantly, but for each size tier they are fairly consistent across meta levels.  Aside from fitting considerations, the only attributes that change from meta 0 all the way to commander modules is the range and the amount of energy neutralized.
 +
* Module activation cost is consistent ({{Co|lightblue|45 GJ}} for small, {{co|lightblue|150 GJ}} for medium, and {{Co|lightblue|500 GJ}} for heavy).  Therefore, at each size, higher meta modules are more efficient: meta 0 modules destabilize as much as their activation cost (100% efficiency), and this efficiency trends up to meta 5 (tech II) and higher modules at 120% efficiency. Module activation costs are reduced by the {{sk|Capacitor Emission Systems|icon=yes}} skill, which provides 33% increased efficiency at level V.
 +
* Cycle time is also consistent ({{Co|lightblue|6 seconds}} for small neuts, {{Co|lightblue|12 seconds}} for medium, and {{Co|lightblue|24 seconds}} seconds for heavy).
 +
* Optimal range for modules from meta 0 to the highest are: small from {{Co|lightgreen|4,000m - 9,000m}}; medium from {{Co|lightgreen|8,000m - 16,500m}}; heavy from {{Co|lightgreen|16,000m - 32,000m}}; and capital from {{Co|lightgreen|30,000m - 40,000m}}.
 +
* Faction and Deadspace Neutralizers have increased range, but the same drain amount as T2 variants. Faction Neutralizers have reduced CPU and Powergrid costs; Deadspace Neutralizers have increased Powergrid costs.
 +
* Overheating a neutralizer shortens its cycle time, which means it will drain its target's capacitor faster but (users should remember) also that it will put an increased load on its user's capacitor.
  
−
TL;DR skip this section if you don't care about the why or the details
+
{{#CSS:
−
<br>
+
<!-- CSS for stats tables -->
−
<br>
 
−
==General Principles==
 
  
−
Capacitor Warfare can only be understood if you first understand capacitors. Capacitors are a self recharging reasource with a [[Capacitor Recharge Rate]] that changes relative to the level of the capacitor.  Accordingly, there is a 'peak' recharge at 25% with the recharge rate decreasing from either side of this peak. Therefore, the rate of recharge is lowest when the capacitor is full (100%) or empty (0%). Shield tankers should inherrently understand this principle as it is identical to the recharge mechanism on shields, and EVE university folks are very lucky to have access to the [[Capacitor Management 101]] class that Neville Smit teaches.
+
.neut-stats td:nth-child(2),
 +
.nos-stats td:nth-child(2)
 +
{
 +
  text-align: center;
 +
  }
  
−
Since cap warfare deals in the removal of capacitor it opposes the recharge rate. And since the recharge rate is lowest at 100% and 0%, cap warfare will have the greatest effect (defined as amount of cap removed) at these levels. Cap warfare will have the least effect at 25% (peak recharge) as the amount of cap removed will be countered by the highest recharge the capacitor is capable of. Therefore, we know that it is more difficult to cap out an enemy than it is to keep them there - ie. you may have three neuts on them to drain their cap as quickly as possible but only need 1 to keep them capped out. (Incidentally it is also easy to see when selecting the cap booster charge that you obviously always want to try to select a charge at least 25% of the size of your capacitor to push you instantly to the 'good' side of your peak recharge rate.)
+
.neut-stats td:nth-last-child(-n+9),
 +
.nos-stats td:nth-last-child(-n+7)
 +
  {
 +
  text-align: right
 +
  }
  
−
With this simple information tucked away we can discuss the particulars of how the individual cap warfare systems work.   
+
.neut-stats td:nth-child(4),
−
<br>
+
.neut-stats td:nth-child(7),
−
<br>
+
.nos-stats td:nth-child(4)
−
==Energy Destabilizers==
+
  {
 +
  color: lightblue;
 +
}
  
−
Energy Destabilizers - ie the assortment of Neutralizers (Neuts) are the heavy hitters of cap warfare. They can remove huge amounts of cap and leave an enemy 'capped out' faster than any other form of cap warfare.
+
.neut-stats td:nth-child(5),
−
*Strengths
+
.neut-stats td:nth-child(6),
−
**Neutralizes large portions of the enemies capacitor every cycle
+
.nos-stats td:nth-child(5),
−
*Weaknesses
+
.nos-stats td:nth-child(6)
−
**Requires large amounts of your capacitor
+
{
−
**Long cycle time
+
  color: lightgreen;
−
**Relatively short ranges (improves with module size)
+
}
  
−
Here is screenshot of the attributes of the meta 0 heavy neut:
+
.neut-stats td:nth-child(8),
 +
.nos-stats td:nth-child(7)
 +
{
 +
  color: red;
 +
}
  
−
[[image:Heavyneut.jpg]]
+
}}
  
−
All neutralizers have a similar set of attributes.  The different sizes of neutralizer differ significantly, but for each size tier they are fairly consistent across meta levels.  Aside from fitting considerations, the only attributes that change from meta 0 all the way to commander modules is the range and the amount of energy neutralized.  The energy 'cost' to neutralize is consistent (45 GJ for small, 150 GJ for medium, and 500 GJ for heavy).  Therefore, at each size higher meta modules are more efficient: meta 0 modules destabilize as much as their activation cost (100% efficiency), and it trends up to meta 5 (tech II) and higher modules at 120% efficiency.  Using the heavy neut example a Tech II neut would neutralize 600GJ with its 500GJ activation cost.  The cycle time is also consistent (6 seconds for small neuts, 12 seconds for medium, and 24 seconds for heavy) and the range for modules from meta 0 to the highest are: small from 5,250m - 7,350m; medium from 10,500m - 14,000m; and heavy from 21,000m - 39,200m.
+
{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed sortable neut-stats" style="font-size:90%; margin: 1em auto"
−
<br>
+
|+ Stats for Small Neuts<small>{{Co|gray|'' - Last verified: January 2017''}}</small>
−
<br>
+
|- style="background-color: #222222;"
−
Stats for Small Neuts 0 - 6 meta level and meta 8 (faction) example
+
! scope="col" | {{Co|#bfbb7d|Meta<br>Group}} <!-- No, I did not forgot to change this one to use style. Doing so will also change the color of the show.hide toggle -->
−
{| border="1"
+
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Meta<br>Level
−
! Meta Level !! Name !! Cycle Time !! Range !! Energy Cost !! Energy Neuted !! Neut Efficiency !! Neuting per Sec
+
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Name
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Cycle<br>Time
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Optimal<br>Range
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Effectiveness<br>Falloff
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Activation<br>Cost}}
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Neutralization<br>Amount
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Neut<br>Efficiency
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Neuting<br>per Sec (GJ)
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Powergrid<br>Usage
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | CPU<br>usage
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 0 || Small Energy Neutralizer I || 6 sec || 5,250m || 45 GJ || 45 GJ || 100% || 7.5 GJ/sec
+
| Tech I || 0 || Small Energy Neutralizer I || 6 sec || 4000 m || 2000 m || 45 GJ || 45 GJ || 100% || 7.5 GJ/s || 8 MW  || 10 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 1 || Small Rudementary Energy Destabilizer I || 6 sec || 5,500m || 45 GJ || 47 GJ || ~104% || ~7.8 GJ/sec
+
| Tech I || 1 || Small Gremlin Compact Energy Neutralizer || 6 sec || 4000 m || 2000 m || 45 GJ || 50 GJ || 111% || 8.3 GJ/s || 7 MW  || 8 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 2 || Small 'Gremlin' Power Core Disruptor I || 6 sec || 5,750m || 45 GJ || 49 GJ || ~109% || ~8.2 GJ/sec
+
| Tech I || 1 || Small Infectious Scoped Energy Neutralizer || 6 sec || 4500 m || 2250 m || 45 GJ || 50 GJ || 111% || 8.3 GJ/s || 8 MW  || 10 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 3 || 5W Infectious Power System Malfunction || 6 sec || 6,025m || 45 GJ || 51 GJ || ~113% || 8.5 GJ/sec
+
| Tech II || 5 || Small Energy Neutralizer II || 6 sec || 5000 m  || 2500 m || 45 GJ || 55 GJ || 122% || 9.2 GJ/s || 10 MW || 10 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 4 || Small Unstable Power Fluctuator I || 6 sec || 6,300m || 45 GJ || 54 GJ || 120% || 9.0 GJ/sec
+
| Storyline || 6  || Small 'Caltrop' Energy Neutralizer || 6 sec || 5000 m || 2500 m || 45 GJ || 55 GJ || 122% || 9.2 GJ/s || 7 MW  || 8 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 5 || Small Energy Neutralizer II || 6 sec || 6,300m || 45 GJ || 54 GJ || 120% || 9.0 GJ/sec
+
| Faction || 8 || Ammatar Navy Small Energy Neutralizer || 6 sec || 6000 m || 3000 m || 45 GJ || 55 GJ || 122% || 9.2 GJ/s || 8 MW  || 10 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 6 || 'Caltrop' Small Energy Neutralizer I || 6 sec || 6,300m || 45 GJ || 54 GJ || 120% || 9.0 GJ/sec
+
| Faction || 8 || Dark Blood Small Energy Neutralizer || 6 sec || 6000 m || 3000 m || 45 GJ || 55 GJ || 122% || 9.2 GJ/s || 8 MW  || 10 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| eg 8 || Imperial Navy Small Energy Neutralizer || 6 sec || 7,350m || 45 GJ || 54 GJ || 120% || 9.0 GJ/sec
+
| Faction || 8 || Imperial Navy Small Energy Neutralizer || 6 sec || 6000 m || 3000 m || 45 GJ || 55 GJ || 122% || 9.2 GJ/s || 8 MW  || 10 tf
 
|-
 
|-
 +
| Faction || 8 || True Sansha Small Energy Neutralizer || 6 sec || 6000 m || 3000 m || 45 GJ || 55 GJ || 122% || 9.2 GJ/s || 8 MW  || 10 tf
 +
|-
 +
| Deadspace || 10 || Corpii C-Type Small Energy Neutralizer || 6 sec || 7000 m || 3500 m || 45 GJ || 55 GJ || 122% || 9.2 GJ/s || 9 MW  || 10 tf
 +
|-
 +
| Deadspace || 12 || Corpii B-Type Small Energy Neutralizer || 6 sec || 8000 m || 4000 m || 45 GJ || 55 GJ || 122% || 9.2 GJ/s || 10 MW || 10 tf
 +
|-
 +
| Deadspace || 14 || Corpii A-Type Small Energy Neutralizer || 6 sec || 9000 m || 4500 m || 45 GJ || 55 GJ || 122% || 9.2 GJ/s || 11 MW || 10 tf
 
|}
 
|}
−
*note: the only difference between meta 4 to 6 is the fitting requirements
+
 
−
*the only difference between meta 8 (faction) and from meta 4 to 6 is the range and fitting
+
{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed sortable neut-stats" style="font-size:90%; margin: 1em auto;"
−
<br>
+
|+ Stats for Medium Neuts<small>{{Co|gray|'' - Last verified: January 2017''}}</small>
−
<br>
+
|- style="background-color:#222222;"
−
Stats for Medium Neuts 0 - 6 meta level and meta 8 (faction) example
+
! scope="col" | {{Co|#bfbb7d"|Meta<br>Group}}
−
{| border="1"
+
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Meta<br>Level
−
! Meta Level !! Name !! Cycle Time !! Range !! Energy Cost !! Energy Neuted !! Neut Efficiency !! Neuting per Sec
+
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Name
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Cycle<br>Time
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Optimal<br>Range
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Effectiveness<br>Falloff
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Activation<br>Cost
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Neutralization<br>Amount
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Neut<br>Efficiency
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Neuting<br>per Sec (GJ)
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Powergrid<br>Usage
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | CPU<br>usage
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 0 || Medium Energy Neutralizer I || 12 sec || 10,500m || 150 GJ || 150 GJ || 100% || 12.5 GJ/sec
+
| Tech I || 0 || Medium Energy Neutralizer || 12 sec || 8000 m || 4000 m || 150 GJ || 150 GJ || 100% || 12.5 GJ/s || 175 MW  || 20 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 1 || Medium Rudementary Energy Destabilizer I || 12 sec || 11,025m || 150 GJ || 158 GJ || ~105% || ~13.2 GJ/sec
+
| Tech I || 1 || Medium Gremlin Compact Energy Neutralizer || 12 sec || 8000 m || 4000 m  || 150 GJ || 165 GJ || 110% || 13.8 GJ/s || 160 MW  || 16 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 2 || Medium 'Gremlin' Power Core Disruptor I || 12 sec || 11,550m || 150 GJ || 165 GJ || 110% || 13.75 GJ/sec
+
| Tech I || 1 || Medium Infectious Scoped Energy Neutralizer || 12 sec || 9000 m || 4500 m || 150 GJ || 165 GJ || 110% || 13.8 GJ/s || 175 MW  || 20 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 3 || 50W Infectious Power System Malfunction || 12 sec || 12,075m || 150 GJ || 173 GJ || ~115% || ~14.4 GJ/sec
+
| Tech II || 5 || Medium Energy Neutralizer II || 12 sec || 10 km || 5000 m || 150 GJ || 180 GJ || 120% || 15.0 GJ/s || 200 MW || 20 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 4 || Medium Unstable Power Fluctuator I || 12 sec || 12,600m || 150 GJ || 180 GJ || 120% || 15 GJ/sec
+
| Storyline || 6 || Medium 'Ditch' Energy Neutralizer || 12 sec || 10 km || 5000 m || 150 GJ || 180 GJ || 120% || 15.0 GJ/s || 160 MW  || 16 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 5 || Medium Energy Neutralizer II || 12 sec || 12,600m || 150 GJ || 180 GJ || 120% || 15 GJ/sec
+
| Faction || 8 || Ammatar Navy Medium Energy Neutralizer || 12 sec || 12 km || 6000 m || 150 GJ || 180 GJ || 120% || 15.0 GJ/s || 175 MW  || 20 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 6 || 'Ditch' Medium Energy Neutralizer I || 12 sec || 12,600m || 150 GJ || 180 GJ || 120% || 15 GJ/sec
+
| Faction || 8 || Dark Blood Medium Energy Neutralizer || 12 sec || 12 km || 6000 m || 150 GJ || 180 GJ || 120% || 15.0 GJ/s || 175 MW  || 20 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| eg 8 || Imperial Navy Medium Energy Neutralizer || 12 sec || 14,000m || 150 GJ || 180 GJ || 120% || 15 GJ/sec
+
| Faction || 8 || Imperial Navy Medium Energy Neutralizer || 12 sec || 12 km || 6000 m || 150 GJ || 180 GJ || 120% || 15.0 GJ/s || 175 MW  || 20 tf
 
|-
 
|-
 +
| Faction || 8 || True Sansha Medium Energy Neutralizer || 12 sec || 12 km || 6000 m || 150 GJ || 180 GJ || 120% || 15.0 GJ/s || 175 MW  || 20 tf
 +
|-
 +
| Deadspace || 10 || Corpum C-Type Medium Energy Neutralizer || 12 sec || 13.5 km || 6750 m || 150 GJ || 180 GJ || 120% || 15.0 GJ/s || 193 MW  || 20 tf
 +
|-
 +
| Deadspace || 12 || Corpum B-Type Medium Energy Neutralizer || 12 sec || 15 km || 7500 m || 150 GJ || 180 GJ || 120% || 15.0 GJ/s || 210 MW || 20 tf
 +
|-
 +
| Deadspace || 14 || Corpum A-Type Medium Energy Neutralizer || 12 sec || 16.5 km || 8250 m  || 150 GJ || 180 GJ || 120% || 15.0 GJ/s || 228 MW || 20 tf
 
|}
 
|}
−
*note: the only difference between meta 4 to 6 is the fitting requirements
+
 
−
*the only difference between meta 8 (faction) and from meta 4 to 6 is the range and fitting
+
{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed sortable neut-stats" style="font-size:90%; margin: 1em auto;"
−
<br>
+
|+ Stats for Heavy Neuts<small> (excluding Officer modules){{Co|gray|'' - Last verified: January 2017''}}</small>
−
<br>
+
|- style="background-color:#222222;"
−
Stats for Medium Neuts 0 - 6 meta level, meta 8 (faction) and meta 14 (commander) example
+
! scope="col" | {{Co|#bfbb7d|Meta<br>Group}}
−
{| border="1"
+
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Meta<br>Level
−
! Meta Level !! Name !! Cycle Time !! Range !! Energy Cost !! Energy Neuted !! Neut Efficiency !! Neuting per Sec
+
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Name
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Cycle<br>Time
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Optimal<br>Range
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Effectiveness<br>Falloff
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Activation<br>Cost
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Neutralization<br>Amount
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Neut<br>Efficiency
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Neuting<br>per Sec (GJ)
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Powergrid<br>Usage
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | CPU<br>usage
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 0 || Heavy Energy Neutralizer I || 24 sec || 21,000m || 500 GJ || 500 GJ || 100% || ~20.8 GJ/sec
+
| Tech I || 0 || Heavy Energy Neutralizer I || 24 sec || 16 km || 8000 m || 500 GJ || 500 GJ || 100% || 20.8 GJ/s || 2000 MW || 40 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 1 || Heavy Rudementary Energy Destabilizer I || 24 sec || 22,050m || 500 GJ || 525 GJ || 105% || ~21.9 GJ/sec
+
| Tech I || 1 || Heavy Gremlin Compact Energy Neutralizer || 24 sec || 16 km || 8000 m || 500 GJ || 550 GJ || 110% || 22.9 GJ/s || 1800 MW || 32 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 2 || Heavy 'Gremlin' Power Core Disruptor I || 24 sec || 23,100m || 500 GJ || 550 GJ || 110% || ~22.9 GJ/sec
+
| Tech I || 1 || Heavy Infectious Scoped Energy Neutralizer || 24 sec || 18 km || 9000 m || 500 GJ || 550 GJ || 110% || 22.9 GJ/s || 2000 MW || 40 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 3 || 500W Infectious Power System Malfunction || 24 sec || 24,150m || 500 GJ || 575 GJ || 115% || ~24.0 GJ/sec
+
| Tech II || 5 || Heavy Energy Neutralizer II || 24 sec || 20 km || 10 km || 500 GJ || 600 GJ || 120% || 25.0 GJ/s || 2250 MW || 40 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 4 || Heavy Unstable Power Fluctuator I || 24 sec || 25,200m || 500 GJ || 600 GJ || 120% || 25 GJ/sec
+
| Storyline || 6 || Heavy 'Moat' Energy Neutralizer || 24 sec || 20 km || 10 km || 500 GJ || 600 GJ || 120% || 25.0 GJ/s || 1800 MW || 32 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 5 || Heavy Energy Neutralizer II || 24 sec || 25,200m || 500 GJ || 600 GJ || 120% || 25 GJ/sec
+
| Faction || 8 || Ammatar Navy Heavy Energy Neutralizer || 24 sec || 24 km || 12 km || 500 GJ || 600 GJ || 120% || 25.0 GJ/s || 2000 MW || 40 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 6 || 'Moat' Heavy Energy Neutralizer I || 24 sec || 25,200m || 500 GJ || 600 GJ || 120% || 25 GJ/sec
+
| Faction || 8 || Dark Blood Heavy Energy Neutralizer || 24 sec || <24 km || 12 km || 500 GJ || 600 GJ || 120% || 25.0 GJ/s || 2000 MW || 40 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| eg 8 || Imperial Navy Heavy Energy Neutralizer || 24 sec || 29,400m || 500 GJ || 600 GJ || 120% || 25 GJ/sec
+
| Faction || 8 || Imperial Navy Heavy Energy Neutralizer || 24 sec || 24 km || 12 km || 500 GJ || 600 GJ || 120% || 25.0 GJ/s || 2000 MW || 40 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| eg 14 || Draclira's Modified Heavy Energy Neutralizer || 24 sec || 39,200m || 500 GJ || 600 GJ || 120% || 25 GJ/sec
+
| Faction || 8 || True Sansha Heavy Energy Neutralizer || 24 sec || 24 km || 12 km || 500 GJ || 600 GJ || 120% || 25.0 GJ/s || 2000 MW || 40 tf
 
|-
 
|-
 +
| Deadspace || 10 || Corpus C-Type Heavy Energy Neutralizer || 24 sec || 26 km || 13 km || 500 GJ || 600 GJ || 120% || 25.0 GJ/s || 2200 MW || 40 tf
 +
|-
 +
| Deadspace || 12 || Corpus B-Type Heavy Energy Neutralizer || 24 sec || 28 km || 14 km  || 500 GJ || 600 GJ || 120% || 25.0 GJ/s || 2400 MW || 40 tf
 +
|-
 +
| Deadspace || 14 || Corpus A-Type Heavy Energy Neutralizer || 24 sec || 30 km || 15 km || 500 GJ|| 600 GJ || 120% || 25.0 GJ/s || 2600 MW || 40 tf
 +
|-
 +
| Deadspace || 16 || Corpus X-Type Heavy Energy Neutralizer || 24 sec || 32 km || 16 km || 500 GJ || 600 GJ || 120% || 25.0 GJ/s || 2800 MW || 40 tf
 
|}
 
|}
−
*note: the only difference between meta 4 to 6 is the fitting requirements
 
−
*the only difference between meta 8 (faction), meta 11 to 14 (commander), and from meta 4 to 6 is the range and fitting
 
−
*meta 11 to 14 (commander) have a huge increase in range - that example is the longest range neut in EVE
 
−
<br>
 
−
<br>
 
−
With these capabilities in mind, a ship fitted, and a victi... er... target located, the neut can be put into action.
 
  
−
There is no falloff and unless you are within the max neut range you will not be able to activate the module.  If you are within range of a target and activate the neut the activation cost will immediately be deducted from your capacitor and the destabilized amount will be instantly deducted from the target's capacitor.  Each cycle time if still within range this will be repeated for as long as you have capacitor to run it. Pretty simple, right?
+
When activating an Energy Neutralizer on a target, the activation cost will immediately be deducted from the neutralizer's capacitor and the neutralization amount (modified, if in falloff range or if the target has some form of resistance) will be immediately deducted from the target's capacitor.  This will be repeated each cycle time for as long as the neut is activated.
  
−
The important thing to remember is that your goal is to 'cap out' your opponent and that you need to use a enough neutralization to overcome the peak recharge rate of their capacitor. Yes, you will make it harder for them to run [http://www.eve-ivy.com/wiki/index.php?title=Capacitor_Management_101#What_is_.22cap_stable.22.3F_Do_I_want_it.3F cap stable], but likely you would be a more efficient killing machine using that high slot for something else if that is all you are accomplishing.  The basic rule of thumb is that a good Cap Warfare setup has a neutralization rate MUCH higher than any concievable recharge rate.  You want to cap out your opponent quickly and then have an easy way to keep the other pilot running on empty.
+
== Energy Nosferatu ==
−
<br>
+
[[File:Vamp.png|left]]'Energy Nosferatu (also called "'''NOS'''" or "'''Energy Vampires'''") remove small amounts of capacitor from their target and use it to recharge the user's capacitor, and cycle more quickly than Energy Neutralizers. However, Energy Nosferatu are far more restricted in their effectiveness due to the double upside inherent in their use. Energy Nosferatu share the limited range of Energy Neutralizers, and drain much less capacitor. Most importantly, Energy Nosferatu only transfer capacitor when '''the user's capacitor is less than the target's capacitor.''' This is measured in terms of absolute capacitor amount, ''not'' capacitor percentage, e.g. a capacitor with 120 GJ of capacitor will always be able to transfer capacitor from a ship with 2000 GJ, regardless of what percentage of each ship's capacitor those amounts represent.
−
<br>
 
−
==Energy Vampires==
 
  
−
Energy Vampires - ie the assortment of Nosferatus (Nos) remove small amounts of cap, but instead of costing your own cap to do this they will actually give you the cap your opponent lost. Because of the huge potential of being able to hurt a target while only aiding yourself there are several rather severe limitations on these modules.
+
[[Pirate Faction Ship Overview#Blood Raiders|Blood Raider]] ships have a unique interaction with Energy Nosferatus: Nosferatus used by Blood Raider ships ''ignore'' the target's capacitor level, and ''always'' transfer energy. This means that, for a Blood Raider ship, a Nosferatu is functionally both an indefinitely sustainable Neutralizer with a lower strength but a much shorter cycle time, and a Cap Booster that does not consume cap charges. This also means that a Blood Raider-run Nosferatu can be used to test whether or not a target ship's capacitor is dry: that NOS will only start draining 0GJ/cycle if the target ''has'' 0GJ available.
−
*Strengths
 
−
**Amount of cap removed from the target is transferred to you
 
−
**Quick cycle time
 
−
*Weaknesses
 
−
**Only transfers cap when your PERCENTAGE of capacitor is below the percentage of the targets capacitor
 
−
**Relatively short ranges (improves with module size)
 
−
**Removes much less cap than neutralizers and require more CPU to fit
 
  
−
Here is screenshot of the attributes of the meta 0 heavy nos:
+
All Nosferatus have a similar set of attributes.  The different sizes of Nosteratus differ significantly, but for each size tier they are fairly consistent across meta levels.  Aside from fitting consideration, the only attributes that change from meta 0 all the way to commander modules is the range and the amount of energy transferred to the user.
 +
* Cycle time is consistent ({{Co|lightblue|2.5 seconds}} for small NOS, {{Co|lightblue|5 seconds}} for medium, and {{Co|lightblue|10 seconds}} for heavy).
 +
* Small Nosferatu will transfer from {{Co|red|8 - 10 GJ}} across the meta levels, medium from {{Co|red|30 - 36 GJ}}, and heavy from {{Co|red|100 - 120 GJ}}.
 +
* Optimal ranges for all the modules from meta 0 to the highest are between: small from {{Co|lightgreen|4,000m - 9,000m}}; medium from {{Co|lightgreen|8,000m - 16,500m}}; and heavy from {{Co|lightgreen|16,000m - 32,000m}}.
 +
* As with neutralizers, overheating a Nosferatu module decreases its cycle time. Unlike overheating a neutralizer, this will result in both more energy drained from the target's capacitor, ''and'' more energy deposited in the user's capacitor.
  
−
[[image:Heavynos.jpg]]
+
{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed sortable nos-stats" style="font-size:90%; margin: 1em auto;"
−
 
+
|+ Stats for Small Nosferatu<small>{{Co|gray|'' - Last verified: January 2017''}}</small>
−
All nosferatus have a similar set of attributes.  The different sizes of nosteratus differ significantly, but for each size tier they are fairly consistent across meta levels.  Aside from fitting consideration, the only attributes that change from meta 0 all the way to commander modules is the range and the amount of energy transferred to you.  The cycle time is consistent (3 seconds for small nos, 6 seconds for medium, and 12 seconds for heavy).  Small nos will transfer from 8 - 10 GJ across the meta levels, medium from 30 - 36 GJ, and heavy from 100 - 135 GJ.  The ranges for all the modules from meta 0 to the highest are between: small from 5,500m - 10,214m; medium from 10,500m - 19,500m; and heavy from 21,000m - 43,000m.
+
|- style="background-color:#222222;"
−
<br>
+
! scope="col" | {{Co|#bfbb7d|Meta<br>Group}}
−
<br>
+
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Meta<br>Level
−
Stats for Small Nos 0 - 6 meta level, meta 8 (faction) example, and meta
+
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Name
−
{| border="1"
+
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Cycle<br>Time
−
! Meta Level !! Name !! Cycle Time !! Range !! Energy Transfered !! Nosing per Sec
+
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Optimal<br>Range
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Effectiveness<br>Falloff
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Neutralization<br>Amount
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Transfer<br>Rate
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Powergrid<br>Usage
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | CPU<br>usage
 +
|-
 +
| Tech I || 0 || Small Energy Nosferatu I  || 2.5 sec || 4000 m || 2000 m || 8 GJ || 3.2 GJ/s || 8 MW  || 15 tf
 +
|-
 +
| Tech I || 1 || Small Ghoul Compact Energy Nosferatu || 2.5 sec || 4000 m || 2000 m || 9 GJ || 3.6 GJ/s || 7 MW || 12 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 0 || Small Nosferatu I || 3 sec || 5,500m || 8 GJ || ~2.7 GJ/sec
+
| Tech I || 1 || Small Knave Scoped Energy Nosferatu || 2.5 sec || 4500 m || 2250 m || 9 GJ || 3.6 GJ/s || 8 MW || 15 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 1 || Small 'Ghoul' Energy Siphon I || 3 sec || 5,775m || 8.4 GJ || 2.8 GJ/sec
+
| Tech II || 5 || Small Energy Nosferatu II || 2.5 sec || 5000 m || 2500 m || 10 GJ || 4 GJ/s || 10 MW || 15 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 2 || Small 'Knave' I Energy Drain || 3 sec || 6,050m || 8.8 GJ || ~2.9 GJ/sec
+
| Storyline || 6 || Small 'Upir' Energy Nosferatu || 2.5 sec || 5000 m || 2500 m || 10 GJ || 4 GJ/s || 7 MW || 12 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 3 || E5 Prototype Energy Vampire || 3 sec || 6,325m || 9.2 GJ || ~3.1 GJ/sec
+
| Faction || 8 || Ammatar Navy Small Energy Nosferatu || 2.5 sec || 6000 m || 3000 m || 10 GJ || 4 GJ/s || 8 MW || 15 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 4 || Small Diminishing Power System Drain I || 3 sec || 6,600m || 9.6 GJ || 3.2 GJ/sec
+
| Faction || 8 || Dark Blood Small Energy Nosferatu || 2.5 sec || 6000 m || 3000 m || 10 GJ || 4 GJ/s || 8 MW || 15 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 5 || Small Nosferatu II || 3 sec || 6,600m || 9.6 GJ || 3.2 GJ/sec
+
| Faction || 8 || Imperial Navy Small Energy Nosferatu || 2.5 sec || 6000 m || 3000 m || 10 GJ || 4 GJ/s || 8 MW || 15 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 6 || 'Upir' Small Nosferatu I || 3 sec || 6,500m || 10 GJ || ~3.3 GJ/sec
+
| Faction || 8 || True Sansha Small Energy Nosferatu || 2.5 sec || 6000 m || 3000 m || 10 GJ || 4 GJ/s || 8 MW || 15 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| eg 8 || Imperial Navy Small Nosferatu || 3 sec || 7,500m || 9.6 GJ || 3.2 GJ/sec
+
| Deadspace || 10 || Corpii C-Type Small Energy Nosferatu || 2.5 sec || 7000 m || 3500 m || 10 GJ || 4 GJ/s || 9 MW || 15 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| eg 13 || Corpii A-Type Small Nosferatu || 3 sec || 10,214m || 10 GJ || ~3.3 GJ/sec
+
| Deadspace || 12 || Corpii B-Type Small Energy Nosferatu || 2.5 sec || 8000 m || 4000 m || 10 GJ || 4 GJ/s || 10 MW || 15 tf
 
|-
 
|-
 +
| Deadspace || 14 || Corpii A-Type Small Energy Nosferatu ||2.5 sec || 9000 m || 4500 m || 10 GJ || 4 GJ/s || 11 MW || 15 tf
 
|}
 
|}
−
*note: the only difference between meta 4 and 5 is the fitting requirements
+
 
−
*the only difference between meta 8 (faction) and from meta 4 and 5 is the range and fitting
+
{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed sortable nos-stats" style="font-size:90%; margin: 1em auto;"
−
*the only difference between meta 11 to 13 (complex) and from meta 6 is the range and fitting
+
|+ Stats for Medium Nosferatu<small>{{Co|gray|'' - Last verified: January 2017''}}</small>
−
<br>
+
|- style="background-color:#222222;"
−
<br>
+
! scope="col" | {{Co|#bfbb7d|Meta<br>Group}}
−
Stats for Med Nos 0 - 6 meta level, meta 8 (faction) example, and meta 12 (complex) example
+
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Meta<br>Level
−
{| border="1"
+
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Name
−
! Meta Level !! Name !! Cycle Time !! Range !! Energy Transfered !! Nosing per Sec
+
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Cycle<br>Time
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Optimal<br>Range
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Effectiveness<br>Falloff
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Neutralization<br>Amount
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Transfer<br>Rate
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Powergrid<br>Usage
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | CPU<br>usage
 +
|-
 +
| Tech I || 0 || Medium Energy Nosferatu I || 5 sec || 8000 m || 4000 m || 30 GJ || 6.0 GJ/s || 175 MW || 25 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 0 || Medium Nosferatu I || 6 sec || 10,500m || 30 GJ || 5.0 GJ/sec
+
| Tech I || 1 || Medium Ghoul Compact Energy Nosferatu || 5 sec || 8000 m || 4000 m || 33 GJ || 6.6 GJ/s || 160 MW || 20 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 1 || Medium 'Ghoul' Energy Siphon I || 6 sec || 11,025m || 32 GJ || ~5.3 GJ/sec
+
| Tech I || 1 || Medium Knave Scoped Energy Nosferatu || 5 sec || 9000 m || 4500 m || 33 GJ</font> || 6.6 GJ/s || 175 MW || 25 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 2 || Medium 'Knave' I Energy Drain || 6 sec || 11,550m || 33 GJ || 5.5 GJ/sec
+
| Tech II || 5 || Medium Energy Nosferatu II || 5 sec || 10 km || 5000 m || 36 GJ || 7.2 GJ/s || 200 MW || 25 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 3 || E50 Prototype Energy Vampire || 6 sec || 12,075m || 35 GJ || ~5.8 GJ/sec
+
| Storyline || 6 || Medium 'Strigoi' Energy Nosferatu || 5 sec || 10 km< || 5000 m || 36 GJ || 7.2 GJ/s || 160 MW || 20 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 4 || Medium Diminishing Power System Drain I || 6 sec || 12,600m || 36 GJ || 6.0 GJ/sec
+
| Faction || 8 || Ammatar Navy Medium Energy Nosferatu || 5 sec || 12 km || 6000 m || 36 GJ || 7.2 GJ/s || 175 MW || 25 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 5 || Medium Nosferatu II || 6 sec || 12,600m || 36 GJ || 6.0 GJ/sec
+
| Faction || 8 || Dark Blood Medium Energy Nosferatu || 5 sec || 12 km || 6000 m || 36 GJ || 7.2 GJ/s || 175 MW || 25 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 6 || 'Strigoi' Medium Nosferatu I || 6 sec || 12,500m || 36 GJ || 6.0 GJ/sec
+
| Faction || 8 || Imperial Navy Medium Energy Nosferatu || 5 sec || 12 km || 6000 m || 36 GJ || 7.2 GJ/s || 175 MW || 25 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| eg 8 || Imperial Navy Medium Nosferatu || 6 sec || 15,000m || 36 GJ || 6.0 GJ/sec
+
| Faction || 8 || True Sansha Medium Energy Nosferatu || 5 sec || 12 km || 6000 m || 36 GJ || 7.2 GJ/s || 175 MW || 25 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| eg 12 || Corpum B-Type Medium Nosferatu || 6 sec || 18,000m || 33 GJ || 5.5 GJ/sec
+
| Deadspace || 10 || Corpum C-Type Medium Energy Nosferatu || 5 sec || 13.5 km || 6750 m || 36 GJ || 7.2 GJ/s || 193 MW || 25 tf
 
|-
 
|-
 +
| Deadspace || 12 || Corpum B-Type Medium Energy Nosferatu || 5 sec || 15 km || 7500 m || 36 GJ || 7.2 GJ/s || 210 MW || 25 tf
 +
|-
 +
| Deadspace || 14 || Corpum A-Type Medium Energy Nosferatu || 5 sec || 16.5 km || 8250 m  || 36 GJ || 7.2 GJ/s || 228 MW || 25 tf
 
|}
 
|}
−
*note: the only difference between meta 4 and 5 is the fitting requirements
+
 
−
*the only difference between meta 8 (faction) and from meta 4 and 5 is the range and fitting
+
{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed sortable nos-stats" style="font-size:90%; margin: 1em auto;"
−
*the only difference between meta 11 to 13 (complex) is the range and fitting
+
|+ Stats for Heavy Nosferatu<small> (excluding Officer modules){{Co|gray|'' - Last verified: January 2017''}}</small>
−
<br>
+
|- style="background-color:#222222;"
−
<br>
+
! scope="col" | {{Co|#bfbb7d|Meta<br>Group}}
−
Stats for Heavy Nos 0 - 6 meta level, meta 8 (faction) example, meta 11 (complex) example, and meta (commander) example
+
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Meta<br>Level
−
{| border="1"
+
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Name
−
! Meta Level !! Name !! Cycle Time !! Range !! Energy Transfered !! Nosing per Sec
+
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Cycle<br>Time
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Optimal<br>Range
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Effectiveness<br>Falloff
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Energy Transfer<br>Amount
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Transfer<br>Rate
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | Powergrid<br>Usage
 +
! scope="col" style="color: #bfbb7d;" | CPU<br>usage
 +
|-
 +
| Tech I || 0 || Heavy Energy Nosferatu I || 10 sec || 16 km || 8000 m || 100 GJ || 10 GJ/s || 2000 MW || 50 tf
 +
|-
 +
| Tech I || 1 || Heavy Ghoul Compact Energy Nosferatu || 10 sec || 16 km || 8000 m || 110 GJ || 11 GJ/s || 1800 MW || 40 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 0 || Heavy Nosferatu I || 12 sec || 21,000m || 100 GJ || ~8.3 GJ/sec
+
| Tech I || 1 || Heavy Knave Scoped Energy Nosferatu || 10 sec || 18 km || 9000 m || 110 GJ || 11 GJ/s || 2000 MW || 50 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 1 || Heavy 'Ghoul' Energy Siphon I || 12 sec || 22,050m || 105 GJ || 8.75 GJ/sec
+
| Tech II || 5 || Heavy Energy Nosferatu II || 10 sec || 20 km || 10 km || 120 GJ || 12 GJ/s || 2250 MW || 50 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 2 || Heavy 'Knave' I Energy Drain || 12 sec || 23,100m || 110 GJ || ~9.2 GJ/sec
+
| Storyline || 6 || Heavy 'Vrykolakas' Energy Nosferatu || 10 sec || 20 km || 10 km || 120 GJ || 12 GJ/s || 1800 MW || 40 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 3 || Heavy Prototype Energy Vampire || 12 sec || 24,150m || 115 GJ || ~9.6 GJ/sec
+
| Faction || 8 || Ammatar Navy Heavy Energy Nosferatu || 10 sec || 24 km || 12 km || 120 GJ || 12 GJ/s || 2000 MW || 50 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 4 || Heavy Diminishing Power System Drain I || 12 sec || 25,200m || 120 GJ || 10.0 GJ/sec
+
| Faction || 8 || Dark Blood Heavy Energy Nosferatu || 10 sec || 24 km || 12 km || 120 GJ || 12 GJ/s || 2000 MW || 50 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 5 || Heavy Nosferatu II || 12 sec || 25,200m || 120 GJ || 10.0 GJ/sec
+
| Faction || 8 || Imperial Navy Heavy Energy Nosferatu || 10 sec || 24 km || 12 km || 120 GJ || 12 GJ/s || 2000 MW || 50 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| 6 || 'Vrykolakas' Heavy Nosferatu I || 12 sec || 25,500m || 120 GJ || 10.0 GJ/sec
+
| Faction || 8 || True Sansha Heavy Energy Nosferatu || 10 sec || 24 km || 12 km || 120 GJ || 12 GJ/s || 2000 MW || 50 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| eg 8 || Imperial Navy Heavy Nosferatu || 12 sec || 30,000m || 120 GJ || 10.0 GJ/sec
+
| Deadspace || 10 || Corpus C-Type Heavy Energy Nosferatu || 10 sec || 26 km || 13 km || 120 GJ || 12 GJ/s || 2200 MW || 50 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| eg 11 || Corpum C-Type Heavy Nosferatu || 12 sec || 33,000m || 120 GJ || 10.0 GJ/sec
+
| Deadspace || 12 || Corpus B-Type Heavy Energy Nosferatu || 10 sec || 28 km || 14 km || 120 GJ || 12 GJ/s || 2400 MW || 50 tf
 
|-
 
|-
−
|| eg 14 || Shaqil's Modified Heavy Nosferatu || 12 sec || 43,000m || 120 GJ || 10.0 GJ/sec
+
| Deadspace || 14 || Corpus A-Type Heavy Energy Nosferatu || 10 sec || 30 km> || 15 km || 120 GJ || 12 GJ/s || 2600 MW || 50 tf
 
|-
 
|-
 +
| Deadspace || 16 || Corpus X-Type Heavy Energy Nosferatu || 10 sec || 32 km || 16 km || 120 GJ || 12 GJ/s || 2800 MW || 50 tf
 
|}
 
|}
−
*note: the only difference between meta 4 and 5 is the fitting requirements
 
−
*the only difference between meta 8 (faction) and from meta 4 to 6 is the range and fitting
 
−
*the only difference between meta 11 to 14 (complex and commander) is the range and fitting
 
−
<br>
 
−
<br>
 
−
So if you are within range of a target, and your cap is lower as a percentage than the cap of that target then an activated nos acts exactly like a neut.  The difference is that the 'activation cost' is a negative amount subtracted from your capacitor (so the cap is added on) equivalent to the amount removed from the opponent. 
 
  
−
The caveat on only actively draining cap from the opponent when your own cap is lower means that the key offenseive element of caping out your opponent specifically requires you to be capped out as well.  Even if this was not the case the low amounts of energy actually removed from a target while using a nosferatu makes it practically impossible to cap out an opponent using these modules.  These are pretty severe limitations.  Accordingly, nos require a different methodology than neuts and can be considered as a defensive form of cap warfare.  Employment as a highslot cap recharger can be very useful for high cap usage fits (often multiple shield booster / armour repper fits will include a nos).  They are also commonly employed in combination with neuts which are obviously cap intensive to run.  If you are using a meta 0 heavy neut on a target with a larger capacitor than you, and 500GJ is 25% percent of your capacitor but only 10% of your targets capacitor, a nos will almost always be running.  It will be helping to directly cap out this target with a much larger capacitor by removing those small amounts of cap while helping to keep your neut running as well.  It is even easier to effectively employ in a gang situation with multiple targets.  While neuting your main target you nos an alternative target and they spend the fight donating cap which is helping to destroy their fleet mate, now if that isn't fun I don't know what is!  Properly employed this synergy between neuts and nos is extremely important.  Nosferatus are extremely useful modules in certain circumstances but they require a better plannning and tactical employment than neuts.
+
When within range of a target, and the target's capacitor amount (not percentage) is higher than your cap amount, then an activated Nosferatu acts similarly to a neut. However, the capacitor drain occurs at the ''end'' of the cycle rather than the beginning, and rather than consuming the user's capacitor to reduce the target's, the energy which is removed from the target's capacitor is added to the user's. A NOS will stay activated as long as the target is in range and pull cap when the cap level condition is met, so there is no downside to keeping a Nosferatu activated at all times. The primary caveat to using Nosferatu is that a NOS is highly likely to be effective when fighting bigger targets, but not likely to work when fighting smaller targets.  
−
<br>
 
−
<br>
 
−
==Energy Neutralizing Drones==
 
  
−
Light, medium and heavy neutralizing drones employ the same general principles as other drones.  General infomation can be found [[Drones|here]] and will not be discussed in this guide.
+
A NOS is easier to effectively employ in a gang situation with multiple targets.  While neuting the main target, a pilot can NOS an alternative target (ideally a bigger ship) to maintain the Nosferatu's effectiveness. Properly employed, this synergy between neuts and NOS is extremely effective.
−
*Energy Neutralizer Drones
 
−
**Strengths
 
−
***normal Drone range mechanics
 
−
***Neutralizer drones have no impact on your cap
 
−
**Weaknesses
 
−
***normal Drone weaknesses of vulnerability, flight times etc.
 
−
***Constant cycle time of 6 seconds for each type of drone with relatively small portions of cap neutralized
 
  
−
Here is a screenshot of the attributes with the information on neutralization for each of the drones:
+
== Energy Neutralizing Drones ==
 +
{{main|Drones#Combat utility drones}}
 +
[[image:lightneutdrone.jpg|thumb|200px|Acolyte EV-300 stats]]
 +
Light, medium and heavy neutralizing drones employ the same general principles as other drones.
  
−
[[image:lightneutdrone.jpg|249px]][[image:medneutdrone.jpg|240px]][[image:heavyneutdrone.jpg|250px]]
+
* Strengths
 +
** Normal drone range mechanics
 +
** Neutralizer drones have no impact on your cap
 +
** Quick 6 sec cycle time for all sizes
 +
* Weaknesses
 +
** Normal drone weaknesses of vulnerability, flight times, inability to overheat, etc.
 +
** Relatively small portions of cap neutralized
  
−
As you can see cycle times are identical for all 3 sizes of drones at 6 seconds.  The amount neutralized is easy to remember as well as it is identical to the drone bandwidth: 5 GJ for light, 10 GJ for medium, and 25 GJ for Heavy drones.  Like all other drone based EWAR, pilot ewar skills have no effect on the drones and there is no stacking or usage concerns between drones.
+
Cycle times are identical (6 seconds) for all three sizes of drones.  The amount neutralized is easy to remember, as it is identical to the drone bandwidth: {{Co|lightblue|5 GJ}} for Light, {{Co|lightblue|10 GJ}} for Medium, and {{Co|lightblue|25 GJ}} for Heavy drones.  Like all other drone-based EWAR, pilot EWAR skills have no effect on the drones. There are no stacking penalties when using Neutralizer Drones.
  
 
Accordingly:
 
Accordingly:
−
A full flight (5) of light drones will neutralize 25 GJ every 6 seconds.  This is roughly 1/2 as effective as 1 small neut.
+
* A full flight (5) light drones will neutralize 25 GJ every 6 seconds.  This is roughly 1/2 as effective as 1 small neut.
 +
* A full flight (5) medium drones will neutralize 50 GJ every 6 seconds.  This is roughly 2/3 as effective as 1 medium neut.
 +
* A full flight (5) heavy drones will neutralize 125 GJ every 6 seconds.  This is exactly as effective as 1 meta 0 heavy neut.
  
−
A full flight (5) medium drones will neutralize 50 GJ every 6 seconds. This is roughly 2/3 as effective as 1 medium neut.
+
== Capital Energy Neutralizers ==
 +
Neutralizers and Nosferatus also exist in Capital sizes, with increased range, strength, and fitting costs to match. However, Capital Neutralizers have a unique feature that sets them apart from other sizes, and also limits their use: Capital Neutralizers have an additional attribute, '''Neutralization Signature Resolution''', which has a value of {{Co|lightblue|8000m}} on all variants. This attribute works similarly to the [[Missile mechanics#Missile damage formula|Explosion Radius]] attribute of Missiles: when the Neutralizer activates, this Signature Resolution value is compared to the target's Signature Radius, and if the target's Sig Radius is less than the neutralizer's Resolution, the neutralizer's strength is reduced based on the ratio of Sig Radius : Sig Resolution. The result of this is that Capital Neutralizers are extremely powerful on-paper, but are only effective against other capital ships, and cannot be meaningfully used against battleships and below. As such, most capital ships that use Neutralizers will fit a Heavy Neutralizer, rather than a Capital-sized variant.
  
−
A full flight (5) heavy drones will neutralize 125 GJ every 6 seconds. This is exactly as effective as 1 meta 0 heavy neut.
+
== Protection from capacitor warfare ==
 +
There are four main ways to protect a ship from capacitor warfare:
 +
# Increase Capacitor capacity and regeneration
 +
# Fit a Capacitor Booster to use as an emergency source of cap
 +
# Fit a Nosferatu of your own, to drain back some of the cap you lose
 +
# In a fleet context, use Remote Cap Transmitters to send cap between allied ships (similar to option #2, but more sustainable)
 +
Number 1 is the most common solution in PvE, and the first three are all commonly used together in PvP. There are several modules that can be used to achieve #1:
 +
* Cap Batteries are the most commonly used, as they increase your capacitor capacity (which increases regeneration rate, and also increases the number of neutralizer cycles required to bring you down to 0), but more importantly, they also all provide a percentage resistance to the power of incoming Neutralizers and Nosferatus. This resistance ranges from {{Co|lightblue|20-28%}} based on the battery variation, and the resistance values from multiple batteries do stack (although [[Stacking penalties]] apply).
 +
* Capacitor Rechargers increase capacitor regeneration rate. Depending on the ship and other fitted modules, they may or may not provide more regeneration than Cap Batteries, so simulate and test to compare.
 +
* Capacitor Power Relays increase capacitor regeneration rate, but reduce the strength of fitted (local) Shield Boosters. This makes them a bad choice for Active Shield Tanked ships, but useful in other cases.
 +
* Power Diagnostic Systems give a modest increase to capacitor regeneration rate and capacity (and several other attributes). The individual bonuses they give are small, but they can sometimes be useful on Shield-tanked ships because they give so many different small bonuses.
 +
* Capacitor Control Circuit Rigs increase capacitor regeneration rate; Semiconductor Memory Cell rigs increase capacitor capacity. CCC Rigs are generally preferred, as their bonus to regeneration is usually more effective than SMC Rigs' bonus to capacity.
 +
* [[Strategic Cruisers]]' Augmented Reactor subsystems give significant bonuses to either capacitor capacity or regeneration, and up to {{Co|lightblue|15%}} resistance (based on Core Systems skill levels) to incoming Neutralizers and Nosferatus.
 +
* Capacitor Flux Coils should '''{{co|red|not}}''' be used for capacitor warfare resistance, as while they significantly increase regeneration speed they also significantly ''reduce'' capacitor capacity, thus making you more vulnerable to having your capacitor quickly dropped to 0.
  
−
So knowing this approximate effectiveness together with the strengths, such as great range, and weaknesses, such as targetability, of drones we will discuss their use in the fitting and fighting section.
+
== Skills ==
−
<br>
+
Prerequisite skills:
−
<br>
+
* {{sk|Capacitor Emission Systems}} is the prerequisite skill for Energy Neutralizers and Nosferatus. It's the only skill that directly impacts the effectiveness of capacitor warfare modules; however, it only affects neuts. It reduces the activation cost of all neuts by 5% per level which has excellent results on efficiency. At level V, a Tech II heavy neut will only require 375 GJ per cycle to neutralize 600 GJ (160% efficiency). Unfortunately, this has no positive effect on NOS or drones as they do not have a capacitor activation cost.
−
<br>
+
* {{sk|Advanced Drone Avionics}} is the prerequisite skill for Neutralizer Drones (and all other electronic warfare drones).
  
−
=Skills=
+
The better a ship's capacitor, the more effectively it can conduct capacitor warfare.  Therefore both {{sk|Capacitor Management}} and {{sk|Capacitor Systems Operation}} are extremely important skills and should be trained to V for serious capacitor warfare users.
  
−
Their is only 1 skill that directly impacts the effectiveness of your Capacitor Warfare modules and it only effects 1 type of cap warfare modules: destabilizers. This skill is [http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Energy_Emission_Systems Energy Emission Systems].  It will reduce the activation cost of all neuts by 5% per level which has excellent results on efficiency.  At level 5 a Tech II heavy neut will only require 375 GJ per cycle to neutralize 600 GJ.  This is 160% efficiency.  Unfortunately this has no positive effect on nos or drones as they do not use capacitor to activate.
+
All the supporting capacitor management skills as listed will assist in getting pilots through a fight with more capacitor available for capacitor warfare.  Depending on preference, ship types, and fits, the relative importance of each skill will change, but each can be considered a good investment of SP.
  
−
The better your capacitor the more effectively you can conduct effective cap warfare.  Therefore both [http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Energy_Management Energy Management] and [http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Energy_Systems_Operation Energy Systems Operation] are extremely important skills and should be trained to 5 for serious cap warfare users.
+
== Implants ==
 +
Talisman [[implants]], the Blood Raider pirate set, directly enhance capacitor warfare by reducing the duration of modules requiring {{sk|Capacitor Emission Systems|icon=yes}}.  The complete high-grade set (slots 1-6) will have an overall effect of -38.12% cycle time. This is of course a huge increase in the amount of GJ/sec drained. A max skill Curse with a full Talisman set will neutralize 40.4 GJ per sec with a single meta 4+ medium neut.
  
−
All the supporting capacitor management skills as listed in [http://www.eve-ivy.com/wiki/index.php?title=Capacitor_Management_101#Capacitor_Enhancing_Skills Capacitor Management 101] will assist in getting you to and through a fight with more cap.  More cap available for cap warfare that is.  Depending on preference, ship types, and fits the relative importance of each skill will change but can all be considered a good investment of SP.
+
Low-Grade: total effect -26.94%
−
<br>
+
{| class="wikitable"
−
<br>
+
! Name !! Effect !! Set Effect !! Attribute
−
<br>
+
|-
 +
| Alpha || 1% reduction of duration || 10% effect on bonus of the set || +2 Perception
 +
|-
 +
| Bravo || 2% reduction of duration || 10% effect on bonus of the set || +2 Memory
 +
|-
 +
| Gamma || 3% reduction of duration || 10% effect on bonus of the set || +2 Willpower
 +
|-
 +
| Delta || 4% reduction of duration || 10% effect on bonus of the set || +2 Intelligence
 +
|-
 +
| Epsilon || 5% reduction of duration || 10% effect on bonus of the set || +2 Charisma
 +
|-
 +
| Omega || || 25% effect on bonus of the set
 +
|}
  
−
=Capacitor Warfare and PvE=
+
High-Grade: total effect -38.12%
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
! Name !! Effect !! Set Effect !! Attribute
 +
|-
 +
| Alpha || 1% reduction of duration || 15% effect on bonus of the set || +3 Perception
 +
|-
 +
| Bravo || 2% reduction of duration || 15% effect on bonus of the set || +3 Memory
 +
|-
 +
| Gamma || 3% reduction of duration || 15% effect on bonus of the set || +3 Willpower
 +
|-
 +
| Delta || 4% reduction of duration || 15% effect on bonus of the set || +3 Intelligence
 +
|-
 +
| Epsilon || 5% reduction of duration || 15% effect on bonus of the set || +3 Charisma
 +
|-
 +
| Omega || || 50% effect on bonus of the set
 +
|}
  
−
NPCs 'cheat' in EVE.  One of the ways they do this is with infinite capacitors.  It is impossible to 'cap out' a rat as there cap will not decrease.
 
  
−
Under the player to NPC behaviour for EWAR, is the caveat that use of neutralizers, neutralizing drones, or nos on NPCs will result in a chance of disrupting both shield or armour repairing by the NPC.  I don't know the numbers but the chance of disrupting repairs increases with the size of the modules and decreases with the size of the NPC ship.  So using a heavy neut on a frigate NPC should have a very high chance of stopping any repairs.  Likewise using a small nos on a BS NPC will have little to no effect on stopping repairs.
+
In addition, the following hardwirings are worth considering in addition to or in place of the Talisman set:
  
−
Additionally because they have infinite cap a nos can be counted on to provide infinite power to the user. As soon as you are below 100% capacitor you can always steadily draw cap from an NPC with a nos. This can be used in mission running quite effectively with certain setups, range likely being the prime limitation. This also means that if you are ever in the situation of sitting on a low sec gate tanking gate guns (not in the Uni of course) you can sit beside the billboard and nos as much as you like to keep your repairers running smoothly.
+
Slot 6
−
<br>
+
* Engineering - 'Squire' Energy Systems Operation EO-6##, +(1-6)% faster capacitor recharge. Most pilots who use cap warfare, especially on dedicated ships, will use cap boosters. As such, cap recharge rate becomes a minor factor in cap warfare.
−
<br>
+
Slot 7
−
<br>
+
* Engineering - 'Squire' Energy Emission Systems ES-7##: -(1-6)% capacitor usage by cap warfare modules and energy transmitters. This implant has a significant impact on the capacitor usage of cap warfare modules. It however stacks with the Egress Port Maximizer rig.
 +
Slot 8
 +
* Engineering - 'Squire' Energy Management EM-8##: +(1-6)% capacitor size. This implant is more useful than the EO-6##, but less than the ES-7##. A bigger capacitor is always useful.
  
−
=Capacitor Warfare and Ships in PvP=
+
== Boosters ==
 +
When approaching [[Medical boosters|boosters]] from a capacitor warfare perspective, Mindflood is the drug of choice.  This booster increases capacitor by a percentage that stacks on top of all other modifiers without stacking penalty.
  
−
Cap warfare is considered a 'secondary' racial EWAR and like warp jamming (web and point) there is not a single racial T1 ship bonused for cap warfare.  ECM, TD, TP, RSD all have their specific bonused T1 platforms, while warp jamming and cap warfare do not.  (How EWAR bonus distribution works is Amarr have TD with Cap Warfare secondary, Gallente has RSD with pointing as secondary, Minmatar has TP with webbing as secondary, and Caldari doesn't have a secondary racial since ECM is overpowered anyways :-P).  Accordingly, in order to get hulls with Cap Warfare and warp jamming bonuses you have to look at T2 or pirate faction vessels.
+
{| class="wikitable"
 +
! Type !! Increases Cap by !! Side Effect Chance !! Side Effect Strength
 +
|-
 +
| Synth || 6% || 0% || 0%
 +
|-
 +
| Standard || 10% || 20% || 20%
 +
|-
 +
| Improved || 15% || 30% || 25%
 +
|-
 +
| Strong || 20% || 40% || 30%
 +
|}
  
−
It is easy to identify the bonused ships.  More difficult to categorize are the things you look for in other ships for cap warfare.  Empty high slots or drone capacity are first.  You need a place to fit the module or some drone capacity to even consider cap warfare.  And high slots and drone capacity are the realm of DPS so if you are considering leaving off shear killing power for cap warfare you have to be careful.  Of course pure utility high slots beg to be filled with a neut or nos in hulls that have them.
+
The potential side effects are:
 +
* Shield Boost Amount
 +
* Armor Repair Amount
 +
* Turret Optimal Range Penalty
 +
* Missile Explosion Cloud Penalty
  
−
The next consideration is your capacitor.  If neuts are planned it better be a stronger capacitor than your intended target's or you risk capping yourself out while they have plenty of power left.  A nos will actually help bolster a weak capacitor and drones will have no effect either way.  So regardless of the cap warfare intended you need to understand and work with your own capacitor.  This may mean rigging or fitting cap mods, employing cargo cap (a cap booster with the very large charges they take packed into your cargo bay), knowning your ship and skills can handle all the pressure you can place on your capacitor, or perhaps identifying that a nos is the best way to suppliment a weak capacitor.
+
On drone boats like the {{sh|Sentinel}}, {{sh|Curse}}, and {{sh|Pilgrim}}, the impact of these possible effects is usually minimal, as DPS usually comes from drones and many popular fits are buffer tanked only.  The worst penalty is potentially the armor repair amount for a solo fit Sentinel or Pilgrim, although there are Curse fits that use missile launchers to up DPS.
  
−
Range is another major consideration when planning around cap warfare.  A setup already dependent on close range lends itself to use of neuts or nos, or a long range ship looking for options against close range aggressors.  A sniper or EWAR fit dependant on using range to stay alive and planning to always warp out if someone even thinks about getting close will have no use for cap warfare modules.  
+
Blood Raider ships using lasers and cap warfare mods may have more of a trade-off to consider.  Individual pilots will have different risk assessments, but once the applicable skills have been trained ({{sk|Neurotoxin Control|icon=yes}} and {{sk|Neurotoxin Recovery|icon=yes}}), the risk and impact of side effects can be greatly reduced.
  
−
There is a lot of function in casual and unbonused cap warfare, and bonused cap warfare ships are, of course, amazing. So now we will discuss this function and some considerations for each of these categories:
+
== Rigs ==
−
<br>
+
The Egress Port Maximizer rigs decrease the capacitor use of all energy weapon modules. The Tech I rig reduces activation cost by 15%, and the Tech II by 20%. More than one rig can be used, but because of stacking penalties, the effects get lower as more rigs are added.
−
<br>
 
−
==Casual Capacitor Warfare==
 
  
−
Any empty utility high slot or spare drone capacity is a reason to consider employing capacitor warfare even on ships that wouldn't meet normal requirements.
+
== Capacitor warfare and PvE ==
 +
Certain [[NPC damage types|NPC Factions]] use Energy Neutralizers as their choice in electronic warfare. This means that capacitor warfare resistance is often not important in PvE, however for fighting certain factions (Blood Raiders, Sleepers, Triglavians, and the Amarr Empire in particular) it can become ''very'' important.
  
−
The 'defensive neut' is one fairly common usage of cap warfare on ships that are otherwise unsuited to it. To illustrate, a long range cruiser like a fleet ECM [http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Blackbird Blackbird] is extremely useful and yet very susceptable to small fast tackle.  Microwarpdriving tackle frigs can ruin a Blackbirds day but the inclusion of 1 medium neut can cap them out in 1 or 2 cycles.  The same is true for any other long range DPS or EWAR looking to combat this threat.  It doesn't just work on long range fits of course.  For example, solo/small gang fits for several Minmatar ships (commonly the [http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Rupture Rupture], [http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Hurricane Hurricane], [http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Typhoon Typhoon] and [http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Tempest Tempest]) often include at least one medium or large neut in their utility highs as part of their defence against smaller targets, especially since the disadvantage of generally small capacitors is rendered irrelevant by using neuts against ships a class size smaller. So a neut is always a workable defensive option when concerned about small close range threats.
+
The use of Energy Neutralizers have an odd history in PvE. Traditionally, Neutralizers have had no effect on NPC ships, as most NPC ships do not use Capacitor to function; and Nosferatus have been of questionable use at best as NPCs had small capacitors and poor regeneration so using a Nosferatu as a backup energy source was generally ineffective. This applies to most common NPC ships found throughout all levels of K-Space and J-Space.
  
−
The 'offensive battery' is another common usage, usually for a single nos in a utility high. This provides cap stability with an offensive edge for certain close range high capacitor usage setups.  Typically a fit like this will burn through cap very quickly without the nos being activated.  This could be a blaster boat with a Nos in a utility high, like a [http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Megathron Megathron], or a [http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Rifter Rifter] with a small nos to keep propulsion, tackle and a small armour repairer running. It is an excellent option to counter the defensive neut setup and allow a point to keep running even with a large or medium neut cycling it dry. Many solo fits for frigates with a utility high can include a nos to keep the frigate's tackle, guns and tank running if it attacks a larger ship which has a neut fitted.
+
However, in the years since the Into The Abyss expansion (May, 2018), that story has changed. All NPC ships which have been introduced since the creation of [[Abyssal Deadspace]], including the ships which are found inside the Abyss and all ships involved in the [[Triglavian Invasion]], '''''do''''' use their Capacitors to power their electronic warfare and local and remote repair abilities, and thus are vulnerable to having energy neutralizers shut them down. (It is not known whether or not they also use capacitor to power their weapons or high-speed 'chase' mode.) These ships can also be used as Nosferatu targets for emergency capacitor sustain, as they themselves frequently bring neutralizers to drain players who would fight them.
  
−
Cumulative neuting can also be extremely effective.  In small gangs or large fleets if everyone fits a neut (even an undersized one) and concentrates that cap warfare on one target it can be just as effective as having a dedicated, bonused neuting ship in your back pocket.
+
== Capacitor Warfare and PvP Ships ==
−
<br>
+
The following ships have some bonus related to Energy Neutralizers and Energy Nosferatu for range, drain amount, or efficiency:
−
<br>
 
  
−
==T1 Usage==
+
=== Frigates ===
 +
* {{sh|Cruor}} (Pirate faction frigate)
 +
** 15% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer drain amount per level of {{sk|Amarr Frigate|icon=yes}}
 +
** Energy Nosferatus will drain energy from targets regardless of capacitor level
 +
* {{sh|Sentinel}} ([[Electronic Attack Ship]])
 +
** 20% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer drain amount per level of {{sk|Amarr Frigate|icon=yes}}
 +
** 80% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer optimal range per level of {{sk|Electronic Attack Ships|icon=yes}}
 +
** 40% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer falloff range per level of {{sk|Electronic Attack Ships|icon=yes}}
 +
* {{sh|Damavik}}, {{sh|Nergal}}
 +
** 50% reduction to Energy Neutralizer capacitor cost
  
−
The lack of bonuses means that it is generally ill advised to fit a T1 ship solely around cap warfare.  This does make me a little sad, however, it does not mean that cap warfare can not be used in T1 ships to devastating effect.  Rather T1 hulls should be selected that alow the usage of Cap Warfare without sacrifising their bonused role.
+
=== Destroyers ===
 +
* {{sh|Dragoon}} (Destroyer)
 +
** 20% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer optimal range per level of {{sk|Amarr Destroyer|icon=yes}}
 +
** 10% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer falloff range per level of {{sk|Amarr Destroyer|icon=yes}}
 +
* {{sh|Kikimora}}, {{sh|Draugur}}
 +
** 50% reduction to Energy Neutralizer capacitor cost
  
−
There are no T1 hulls in the game with a direct bonus to capacitor warfare, but some ships are better suited for it than others.
+
=== Cruisers ===
 +
* {{sh|Ashimmu}} (Pirate faction cruiser)
 +
** 15% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer drain amount per level of {{sk|Amarr Cruiser|icon=yes}}
 +
** Energy Nosferatus will drain energy from targets regardless of capacitor level
 +
* {{sh|Pilgrim}} ([[Recon Ship]])
 +
** 10% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer drain amount per level of {{sk|Recon Ships|icon=yes}}
 +
** 20% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer optimal range per level of {{sk|Recon Ships|icon=yes}}
 +
** 10% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer falloff range per level of {{sk|Recon Ships|icon=yes}}
 +
* {{sh|Curse}} ([[Recon Ship]])
 +
** 40% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer optimal range per level of {{sk|Recon Ships|icon=yes}}
 +
** 20% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer falloff range per level of {{sk|Recon Ships|icon=yes}}
 +
** 20% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer drain amount per level of {{sk|Recon Ships|icon=yes}}
 +
* {{sh|Legion}} ([[Strategic Cruiser]], equipped with Energy Parasitic Complex Electronic Subsystem)
 +
** 10% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer drain amount per level of {{sk|Amarr Core Systems|icon=yes}}
 +
** 10% bonus to the benefits of overheating Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer modules per level of {{sk|Amarr Core Systems|icon=yes}}
 +
* {{sh|Vedmak}}, {{sh|Rodiva}}, {{sh|Ikitursa}}, {{sh|Zarmazd}}
 +
** 50% reduction to Energy Neutralizer capacitor cost
  
−
With the strength of capacitor being a prime consideration on a non-bonused hull, Amarr ships are generally the best non bonused cap warfare ships.  The general race capacitor strengths are Amarr > Gallente ~ Caldari > Minmatar.  Minmatar ships and Gallente droneboats are often particularly well supplied with utility highs. Any ship which doesn't use capacitor to run its weapons (Minmatar projectile ships, Gallente drone ships, Caldari missile ships and Amarr ships fitted with [[Turrets#Projectile_Turrets|projectile turrets]]) or to maintain its tank (buffer armour tanks and passive shield tanks without active hardeners) has more capacitor to spare for capacitor warfare.
+
=== Battlecruisers ===
 +
* {{sh|Drekavac}}
 +
** 50% reduction to Energy Neutralizer capacitor cost
  
−
<br>
+
=== Battleships ===
−
<br>
+
* {{sh|Armageddon}} (Battleship)
−
===[http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Punisher Punisher]===
+
** 10% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer optimal range per level of {{sk|Amarr Battleship|icon=yes}}
−
 
+
** 5% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer falloff range per level of {{sk|Amarr Battleship|icon=yes}}
−
The Punisher has an inordinately large capacitor for a T1 frigate.  In fact, at 425 GJ without skills, it is larger than its runners up by 75 GJ (the Caldari Merlin and Gallente Tristan at 350 GJ - the Minmatar Rifter only has a 250 GJ capacitor), it is also has a larger one than all T2 frigates other than the Retribution (Amarr Assault Ship), and most of the faction frigates.  It also has a utility high slot unuseable for DPS due to the number of turret and lack of missile slots.  Finally it is particularly well suited to a negligable (DCU) capacitor armour tank due to its inherrent armour resist bonuses, four low slots, and very nice amount of shield and armour HP.  Taken together the Punisher is the undisputed King of T1 frigate cap warfare platforms.
+
* {{sh|Bhaalgorn}} (Pirate faction battleship)
−
 
+
** 15% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer drain amount per level of {{sk|Amarr Battleship|icon=yes}}
−
** The Punisher is the T1 frigate with the most robust capacitor and at least one (venerable) [http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=289086 strategy] for fitting it relies on a nos in precisely this way.
+
** Energy Nosferatus will drain energy from targets regardless of capacitor level
−
<br>
+
* {{sh|Leshak}}
−
<br>
+
** 50% reduction to Energy Neutralizer capacitor cost
−
===Imperial Navy Slicer===
 
−
 
 
−
This faction frigate shares many of the Punishers advantages for Capacitor Warfare.  It has a very large capacitor for its class size: 500 GJ without skills.  It has a utility high slot due to the number of turret and lack of missle slots.  It has a very good tank with 5 low slots, lending itself to a negligable (DCU) armour buffer tank if desired.
 
−
 
 
−
If used for cap warfare the optimal range bonus with Imperial Navy Mutifrequency (s) ties in rather well with the short range of small neuts or noses, and the effectiveness of a Multifrequency Pulse, Neut, AB, Scram, buffer tanked slicer is undeniable.
 
−
<br>
 
−
<br>
 
−
===cruisers tbi===
 
−
 
 
−
Arby
 
−
Vexor?
 
−
 
 
−
===bcs tbi===
 
−
 
 
−
Myrm?
 
−
 
 
−
===[http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Dominix Dominix]===
 
−
 
 
−
* Gallente drone boats rely on drones for much of their DPS and sometimes fit their high slots for capacitor warfare -- neuts are particularly common on the [http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Dominix Dominix].
 
−
* The Amarr [http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Arbitrator Arbitrator] is also a drone boat, and so sometimes fits neuts and/or noses for the same reason.
 
−
 
 
−
<br>
 
−
<br>
 
−
<br>
 
−
 
 
−
==Capacitor Warfare Bonused Ships==
 
−
 
 
−
And finally we get to the ships truly designed to specialize in and rule the world with cap warfare.
 
−
<br>
 
−
<br>
 
−
===Amarr T2 and T3 Ships===
 
−
 
 
−
Sentinel
 
−
{{Cap Warfare Ship
 
−
|shipimg=Sentinel.jpg
 
−
|caption=Sentinel
 
−
|shipname=Sentinel
 
−
|class=
 
−
|bonuses='''Amarr Frigate Skill Bonus:'''<br>
 
−
20% bonus to energy vampire and energy neutralizer transfer amount per level<br>
 
−
5% bonus to effectiveness of tracking disruptors per level<br>
 
−
<br>
 
−
'''Electronic Attack Ships Skill Bonus:'''<br>
 
−
40% bonus to energy vampire and energy neutralizer range per level<br>
 
−
5% reduction in capacitor recharge time per level
 
−
|highs=3
 
−
|turrets=2
 
−
|launchers=0
 
−
|mediums=4
 
−
|lows=3
 
−
|dronecapacity=60 m3
 
−
|dronebandwidth=20 Mbit/sec
 
−
|cargohold=165 m3
 
−
|cap=415 GJ  +3.3 GJ/sec @ peak recharge
 
−
|info=
 
−
}}
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
Pilgrim
 
−
{{Cap Warfare Ship
 
−
|shipimg=Pilgrim.jpg
 
−
|caption=Pilgrim
 
−
|shipname=Pilgrim
 
−
|class=
 
−
|bonuses='''Amarr Cruiser Skill Bonus:'''<br>
 
−
5% bonus to Tracking Disruptor effectiveness per level<br>
 
−
10% bonus to drone hit points and damage per level<br>
 
−
<br>
 
−
'''Recon Ships Skill Bonus:'''<br> 
 
−
20% bonus to Energy Vampire and Energy Neutralizer transfer amount per level<br>
 
−
-96% to -100% reduction in Cloaking Device CPU use per level<br>
 
−
<br>
 
−
'''Role Bonus:'''<br>
 
−
80% reduction in liquid ozone consumption for cynosural field generation<br>
 
−
50% reduction in cynosural field duration<br>
 
−
'''Note:'''<br>
 
−
can fit covert cynosural field generators
 
−
|highs=4
 
−
|turrets=3
 
−
|launchers=0
 
−
|mediums=5
 
−
|lows=5
 
−
|dronecapacity=150 m3
 
−
|dronebandwidth=50 Mbit/sec
 
−
|cargohold=315 m3
 
−
|cap=1250 GJ  +9.1 GJ/sec @ peak recharge
 
−
|info=
 
−
}}
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
Curse
 
−
{{Cap Warfare Ship
 
−
|shipimg=Curse.jpg
 
−
|caption=Curse
 
−
|shipname=Curse
 
−
|class=
 
−
|bonuses='''Amarr Cruiser Skill Bonus:'''<br>
 
−
5% bonus to Tracking Disruptor effectiveness per level<br>
 
−
10% bonus to drone hit points and damage per level<br>
 
−
<br>
 
−
'''Recon Ships Skill Bonus:'''<br> 
 
−
40% bonus to Energy Vampire and Energy Neutralizer range per level<br>
 
−
20% bonus to Energy Vampire and Energy Neutralizer transfer amount per level<br>
 
−
|highs=5
 
−
|turrets=2
 
−
|launchers=4
 
−
|mediums=6
 
−
|lows=4
 
−
|dronecapacity=150 m3
 
−
|dronebandwidth=50 Mbit/sec
 
−
|cargohold=345 m3
 
−
|cap=1250 GJ  +9.1 GJ/sec @ peak recharge
 
−
|info=
 
−
}}
 
  
 +
=== Capital Ships ===
 +
* {{sh|Chemosh}}
 +
** 15% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer drain amount per level of {{sk|Amarr Dreadnought|icon=yes}}
 +
** Energy Nosferatus will drain energy from targets regardless of capacitor level
 +
* {{sh|Zirnitra}}
 +
** 50% reduction to Energy Neutralizer capacitor cost
 +
* {{sh|Dagon}}
 +
** 20% bonus to Energy Nosferatu drain amount, optimal range, and falloff range, per level of {{sk|Amarr Carrier|icon=yes}}
 +
** Energy Nosferatus will drain energy from targets regardless of capacitor level
 +
* {{sh|Molok}}
 +
** 15% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer drain amount per level of {{sk|Amarr Titan|icon=yes}}
 +
** Energy Nosferatus will drain energy from targets regardless of capacitor level
  
 +
== Unbonused ships ==
 +
A number of ships fitted for cap warfare are not bonused for it. The {{sh|Dominix}} and the {{sh|Prophecy}} are well known examples of ships with no bonus to cap warfare range or transfer amount which have been used with great effect. While any ship could conceivably be fitted with a neutralizer or a nos, the following elements help make an unbonused ship suitable for cap warfare:
 +
* Free high slots. The ship needs a place to fit the modules.
 +
* Drone capacity. When using high slots for neuts, pilots have to rely on drones for damage. A drone damage bonus is also helpful.
 +
* Powergrid. Neuts cost a lot of powergrid to install.
 +
* Capacitor size. Neuts cost a lot of cap to run, and a ship with a big capacitor will be easier to fight with.
 +
* Tank. Neutralizers and Nosferatus have short ranges, so pilots will need to be close to their target, and will thus be more vulnerable to damage.
 +
* Range. In an unbonused ship, you need to be be close to your target to use cap warfare modules. Don't mix cap warfare modules with long range modules such as ewar.
  
−
Legion - with Electronic Parasytic Complex (Electronics Subsystem)
+
=== Frigates ===
 +
* The {{sh|Punisher}} is often flown with a utility cap warfare module.
 +
* Many solo fits for frigates use a small cap wafare module.
  
−
===Blood Raider Ships===
+
=== Destroyers ===
 +
* Except for the {{sh|Dragoon}} (see above), destroyers are not usually used for cap warfare.
  
−
Cruor
+
=== Cruisers ===
 +
* The {{sh|Arbitrator}} is usually flown with cap warfare modules. Its tank is not that great but it has a nice drone damage bonus.
 +
* The {{sh|Maller}} can be used as a surprise neuting cruiser. It won't have any dps to speak of, but can fit a point, a scram or a web while being cap stable and have more than 50K EHP.
 +
* The {{sh|Rupture}} is often flown with a utility cap warfare module.
 +
* The {{sh|Stratios}}, when used as a covert hunting ship (usually in [[Wormhole space]]), is often fit with 3 Neutralizers (alongside its probe launcher, cloak, and large Drone bay).
  
−
Ashimmu
+
=== Battlecruisers ===
 +
* The {{sh|Prophecy}} can be effectively fitted with capacitor warfare modules in its high slots. It has a good tank, capacitor and with good drone skills a reasonable amount of dps.
 +
* Brawling [[image:isis_minmatar.png|22px|link=|Minmatar]][[Hurricane]]s are often flown with a utility cap warfare module.
  
−
Bhaalgorn
+
=== Battleships ===
 +
* The {{sh|Dominix}} is often used a cap warfare ship. Its great drone bonus makes it ideal as a close range cap warfare ship.
 +
* Brawling [[image:isis_minmatar.png|22px|link=|Minmatar]][[Typhoon]]s are often flown with a utility cap warfare module.
 +
* [[image:isis_minmatar.png|22px|link=|Minmatar]][[Tempest]]s are often flown with a utility cap warfare module.
  
  
  
−
Credits
+
[[Category:Game mechanics]]
  
−
[[Category:Guides]]
 
−
[[Category:PvE]]
 
 
[[Category:PvP]]
 
[[Category:PvP]]

Latest revision as of 11:50, 16 March 2024

Weapon Systems
Icon gunnery turret.pngTurrets
Icon missiles.pngMissiles
Icon drones.pngDrones
Other Weapon Systems
Other Mechanics
Visual effects for Energy Neutralizers (left) and Energy Nosferatus (right)

Capacitor warfare is the attack strategy of using equipment to drain a target ship's capacitor, its available energy for powered modules. A ship without sufficient capacitor energy can lose the ability to fire certain weapons, actively repair itself, use propulsion equipment or other powered modules, or even warp to another location.

Overview

Heavy Energy Neutralizer I stats

Capacitor warfare (or "cap warfare") equipment drains capacitor energy from the target ship. Both modules and drones are available and come in multiple types:

  • Energy Neutralziers ("neuts") destroy capacitor energy, consuming a large amount from the attacker to nullify a similar amount from the target ship. [High slot, short range]
  • Energy Nosferatu ("vampires", "NOS") siphon a small amount of energy, transferring it from the target to the attacker (with restrictions). [High slot, short range]
  • Energy Neutralizer Drones - Light, medium, and heavy drones, and a wing of support fighters, based on Amarr combat drones.

Cap warfare modules are fitted into a ship's High slot, and both types, Neutralizers and Nosferatu, operate at short range. (By contrast, most electronic warfare modules are Mid slot modules and operate at mid-range or long-range.) While conventional weapons require a turret or missile launcher High slot, a capacitor warfare module has no such requirement and can fit into any High slot.

Ships can resist capacitor warfare by fitting modules with Neutralizer Resistance, such as the Cap Battery. Also, one ship may transfer capacitor energy to another by using a Remote Capacitor Transmitter.

Limitations

Some systems are unaffected by capacitor warfare. Projectile turrets and Missile Launchers do not require capacitor energy to operate. Shields continue to function and regenerate without capacitor needs, and subspace engines still function. However, a ship with a fully drained capacitor cannot warp or activate propulsion equipment, severely limiting range control and escape options.

General principles

Understanding capacitor warfare requires an understanding of capacitor mechanics. Capacitors are a self-recharging resource measured in gigajoules (GJ), with a capacitor recharge rate determined both by the specific ship and the percentage level of the capacitor, measured in gigajoules per second (GJ/sec). The 'peak' recharge rate occurs at 25% capacity, with the recharge rate sharply decreasing below this amount, and more gradually decreasing above it. Therefore, the rate of recharge is lowest when the capacitor is full (100%) or empty (0%). This is the same principle that governs the recharge rate of shields, though the values are slightly different.

The goal of capacitor warfare is to use enough neutralization to overcome the peak recharge rate of the target's capacitor, and while capacitors recharge continuously over time, Neutralizers remove capacitor in single large chunks with every module cycle. As a result, the effectiveness of Neutralizers is often expressed in effective GJ/sec to facilitate easier comparison to the target's recharge rate. Capacitor warfare will have the smallest relative effects at around peak recharge, as the amount of capacitor removed will be countered by the highest recharge rate the target's capacitor is capable of. As a result, it is much more difficult to "break" a target by bringing its capacitor below 25% than it is to keep it at 0% once it gets there. (i.e. it may take 3 Neutralizer modules to bring a target below 25%, but only one Neutralizer module to keep it at close to 0.) As such, the common rule of thumb for Neutralizer-focused ships or fleets is to have much higher neutralization potential than the enemy's conceivable recharge rate.

This being said, even without sufficient neutralizers to break a target, neutralizers can still have a meaningful effect on them. A pilot whose ship is hovering at around 30% capacitor needs to start making choices about which capacitor-consuming modules to use or not use, or may need to start using a Cap Booster to keep themselves up. Being forced to choose which modules not to run opens room for mistakes, and may force the target pilot to choose between not performing their role in the fleet, or dying; and Cap Booster charges will eventually run out in a longer fight and result in a slow death by attrition.

Like many other Electronic Warfare modules, Capacitor Warfare modules have both Optimal and Falloff ranges. Using modules outside their Optimal range results in reduced effectiveness. The formula for effectiveness loss is the same as Turret falloff:

  • at 100% Optimal + 0% Falloff = 100% Effectiveness
  • at 100% Optimal + 100% Falloff = ~50% Effectiveness
  • at 100% Optimal + 200% Falloff = ~6% Effectiveness
  • at 100% Optimal + 300% Falloff, the module shuts down as the target is considered 'out of range'.

Like weapons, capacitor warfare modules benefit from overheating; as an overheated weapon deals more damage-per-second, an overheated capacitor warfare module sucks the opponent dry faster.

Energy Neutralizers

Icon energy neutralizer i.png

Energy Neutralizers ("Neuts", also formerly called Energy Destabilizers) are the heavy hitters of capacitor warfare, able to remove large amounts of capacitor and leave an enemy capped out faster than any other capacitor warfare system. However, they also require a large amount of capacitor to activate and have a long cycle time. Energy Neutralizers have relatively short ranges, though this range scales with module size to retain effectiveness on larger hulls.

All neutralizers have a similar set of attributes. The different sizes of neutralizer differ significantly, but for each size tier they are fairly consistent across meta levels. Aside from fitting considerations, the only attributes that change from meta 0 all the way to commander modules is the range and the amount of energy neutralized.

  • Module activation cost is consistent (45 GJ for small, 150 GJ for medium, and 500 GJ for heavy). Therefore, at each size, higher meta modules are more efficient: meta 0 modules destabilize as much as their activation cost (100% efficiency), and this efficiency trends up to meta 5 (tech II) and higher modules at 120% efficiency. Module activation costs are reduced by the Icon skillbook2.png Capacitor Emission Systems skill, which provides 33% increased efficiency at level V.
  • Cycle time is also consistent (6 seconds for small neuts, 12 seconds for medium, and 24 seconds seconds for heavy).
  • Optimal range for modules from meta 0 to the highest are: small from 4,000m - 9,000m; medium from 8,000m - 16,500m; heavy from 16,000m - 32,000m; and capital from 30,000m - 40,000m.
  • Faction and Deadspace Neutralizers have increased range, but the same drain amount as T2 variants. Faction Neutralizers have reduced CPU and Powergrid costs; Deadspace Neutralizers have increased Powergrid costs.
  • Overheating a neutralizer shortens its cycle time, which means it will drain its target's capacitor faster but (users should remember) also that it will put an increased load on its user's capacitor.


When activating an Energy Neutralizer on a target, the activation cost will immediately be deducted from the neutralizer's capacitor and the neutralization amount (modified, if in falloff range or if the target has some form of resistance) will be immediately deducted from the target's capacitor. This will be repeated each cycle time for as long as the neut is activated.

Energy Nosferatu

Vamp.png

'Energy Nosferatu (also called "NOS" or "Energy Vampires") remove small amounts of capacitor from their target and use it to recharge the user's capacitor, and cycle more quickly than Energy Neutralizers. However, Energy Nosferatu are far more restricted in their effectiveness due to the double upside inherent in their use. Energy Nosferatu share the limited range of Energy Neutralizers, and drain much less capacitor. Most importantly, Energy Nosferatu only transfer capacitor when the user's capacitor is less than the target's capacitor. This is measured in terms of absolute capacitor amount, not capacitor percentage, e.g. a capacitor with 120 GJ of capacitor will always be able to transfer capacitor from a ship with 2000 GJ, regardless of what percentage of each ship's capacitor those amounts represent.

Blood Raider ships have a unique interaction with Energy Nosferatus: Nosferatus used by Blood Raider ships ignore the target's capacitor level, and always transfer energy. This means that, for a Blood Raider ship, a Nosferatu is functionally both an indefinitely sustainable Neutralizer with a lower strength but a much shorter cycle time, and a Cap Booster that does not consume cap charges. This also means that a Blood Raider-run Nosferatu can be used to test whether or not a target ship's capacitor is dry: that NOS will only start draining 0GJ/cycle if the target has 0GJ available.

All Nosferatus have a similar set of attributes. The different sizes of Nosteratus differ significantly, but for each size tier they are fairly consistent across meta levels. Aside from fitting consideration, the only attributes that change from meta 0 all the way to commander modules is the range and the amount of energy transferred to the user.

  • Cycle time is consistent (2.5 seconds for small NOS, 5 seconds for medium, and 10 seconds for heavy).
  • Small Nosferatu will transfer from 8 - 10 GJ across the meta levels, medium from 30 - 36 GJ, and heavy from 100 - 120 GJ.
  • Optimal ranges for all the modules from meta 0 to the highest are between: small from 4,000m - 9,000m; medium from 8,000m - 16,500m; and heavy from 16,000m - 32,000m.
  • As with neutralizers, overheating a Nosferatu module decreases its cycle time. Unlike overheating a neutralizer, this will result in both more energy drained from the target's capacitor, and more energy deposited in the user's capacitor.

When within range of a target, and the target's capacitor amount (not percentage) is higher than your cap amount, then an activated Nosferatu acts similarly to a neut. However, the capacitor drain occurs at the end of the cycle rather than the beginning, and rather than consuming the user's capacitor to reduce the target's, the energy which is removed from the target's capacitor is added to the user's. A NOS will stay activated as long as the target is in range and pull cap when the cap level condition is met, so there is no downside to keeping a Nosferatu activated at all times. The primary caveat to using Nosferatu is that a NOS is highly likely to be effective when fighting bigger targets, but not likely to work when fighting smaller targets.

A NOS is easier to effectively employ in a gang situation with multiple targets. While neuting the main target, a pilot can NOS an alternative target (ideally a bigger ship) to maintain the Nosferatu's effectiveness. Properly employed, this synergy between neuts and NOS is extremely effective.

Energy Neutralizing Drones

Main article: Drones#Combat utility drones
Acolyte EV-300 stats

Light, medium and heavy neutralizing drones employ the same general principles as other drones.

  • Strengths
    • Normal drone range mechanics
    • Neutralizer drones have no impact on your cap
    • Quick 6 sec cycle time for all sizes
  • Weaknesses
    • Normal drone weaknesses of vulnerability, flight times, inability to overheat, etc.
    • Relatively small portions of cap neutralized

Cycle times are identical (6 seconds) for all three sizes of drones. The amount neutralized is easy to remember, as it is identical to the drone bandwidth: 5 GJ for Light, 10 GJ for Medium, and 25 GJ for Heavy drones. Like all other drone-based EWAR, pilot EWAR skills have no effect on the drones. There are no stacking penalties when using Neutralizer Drones.

Accordingly:

  • A full flight (5) light drones will neutralize 25 GJ every 6 seconds. This is roughly 1/2 as effective as 1 small neut.
  • A full flight (5) medium drones will neutralize 50 GJ every 6 seconds. This is roughly 2/3 as effective as 1 medium neut.
  • A full flight (5) heavy drones will neutralize 125 GJ every 6 seconds. This is exactly as effective as 1 meta 0 heavy neut.

Capital Energy Neutralizers

Neutralizers and Nosferatus also exist in Capital sizes, with increased range, strength, and fitting costs to match. However, Capital Neutralizers have a unique feature that sets them apart from other sizes, and also limits their use: Capital Neutralizers have an additional attribute, Neutralization Signature Resolution, which has a value of 8000m on all variants. This attribute works similarly to the Explosion Radius attribute of Missiles: when the Neutralizer activates, this Signature Resolution value is compared to the target's Signature Radius, and if the target's Sig Radius is less than the neutralizer's Resolution, the neutralizer's strength is reduced based on the ratio of Sig Radius : Sig Resolution. The result of this is that Capital Neutralizers are extremely powerful on-paper, but are only effective against other capital ships, and cannot be meaningfully used against battleships and below. As such, most capital ships that use Neutralizers will fit a Heavy Neutralizer, rather than a Capital-sized variant.

Protection from capacitor warfare

There are four main ways to protect a ship from capacitor warfare:

  1. Increase Capacitor capacity and regeneration
  2. Fit a Capacitor Booster to use as an emergency source of cap
  3. Fit a Nosferatu of your own, to drain back some of the cap you lose
  4. In a fleet context, use Remote Cap Transmitters to send cap between allied ships (similar to option #2, but more sustainable)

Number 1 is the most common solution in PvE, and the first three are all commonly used together in PvP. There are several modules that can be used to achieve #1:

  • Cap Batteries are the most commonly used, as they increase your capacitor capacity (which increases regeneration rate, and also increases the number of neutralizer cycles required to bring you down to 0), but more importantly, they also all provide a percentage resistance to the power of incoming Neutralizers and Nosferatus. This resistance ranges from 20-28% based on the battery variation, and the resistance values from multiple batteries do stack (although Stacking penalties apply).
  • Capacitor Rechargers increase capacitor regeneration rate. Depending on the ship and other fitted modules, they may or may not provide more regeneration than Cap Batteries, so simulate and test to compare.
  • Capacitor Power Relays increase capacitor regeneration rate, but reduce the strength of fitted (local) Shield Boosters. This makes them a bad choice for Active Shield Tanked ships, but useful in other cases.
  • Power Diagnostic Systems give a modest increase to capacitor regeneration rate and capacity (and several other attributes). The individual bonuses they give are small, but they can sometimes be useful on Shield-tanked ships because they give so many different small bonuses.
  • Capacitor Control Circuit Rigs increase capacitor regeneration rate; Semiconductor Memory Cell rigs increase capacitor capacity. CCC Rigs are generally preferred, as their bonus to regeneration is usually more effective than SMC Rigs' bonus to capacity.
  • Strategic Cruisers' Augmented Reactor subsystems give significant bonuses to either capacitor capacity or regeneration, and up to 15% resistance (based on Core Systems skill levels) to incoming Neutralizers and Nosferatus.
  • Capacitor Flux Coils should not be used for capacitor warfare resistance, as while they significantly increase regeneration speed they also significantly reduce capacitor capacity, thus making you more vulnerable to having your capacitor quickly dropped to 0.

Skills

Prerequisite skills:

  • Capacitor Emission Systems is the prerequisite skill for Energy Neutralizers and Nosferatus. It's the only skill that directly impacts the effectiveness of capacitor warfare modules; however, it only affects neuts. It reduces the activation cost of all neuts by 5% per level which has excellent results on efficiency. At level V, a Tech II heavy neut will only require 375 GJ per cycle to neutralize 600 GJ (160% efficiency). Unfortunately, this has no positive effect on NOS or drones as they do not have a capacitor activation cost.
  • Advanced Drone Avionics is the prerequisite skill for Neutralizer Drones (and all other electronic warfare drones).

The better a ship's capacitor, the more effectively it can conduct capacitor warfare. Therefore both Capacitor Management and Capacitor Systems Operation are extremely important skills and should be trained to V for serious capacitor warfare users.

All the supporting capacitor management skills as listed will assist in getting pilots through a fight with more capacitor available for capacitor warfare. Depending on preference, ship types, and fits, the relative importance of each skill will change, but each can be considered a good investment of SP.

Implants

Talisman implants, the Blood Raider pirate set, directly enhance capacitor warfare by reducing the duration of modules requiring Icon skillbook2.png Capacitor Emission Systems. The complete high-grade set (slots 1-6) will have an overall effect of -38.12% cycle time. This is of course a huge increase in the amount of GJ/sec drained. A max skill Curse with a full Talisman set will neutralize 40.4 GJ per sec with a single meta 4+ medium neut.

Low-Grade: total effect -26.94%

Name Effect Set Effect Attribute
Alpha 1% reduction of duration 10% effect on bonus of the set +2 Perception
Bravo 2% reduction of duration 10% effect on bonus of the set +2 Memory
Gamma 3% reduction of duration 10% effect on bonus of the set +2 Willpower
Delta 4% reduction of duration 10% effect on bonus of the set +2 Intelligence
Epsilon 5% reduction of duration 10% effect on bonus of the set +2 Charisma
Omega 25% effect on bonus of the set

High-Grade: total effect -38.12%

Name Effect Set Effect Attribute
Alpha 1% reduction of duration 15% effect on bonus of the set +3 Perception
Bravo 2% reduction of duration 15% effect on bonus of the set +3 Memory
Gamma 3% reduction of duration 15% effect on bonus of the set +3 Willpower
Delta 4% reduction of duration 15% effect on bonus of the set +3 Intelligence
Epsilon 5% reduction of duration 15% effect on bonus of the set +3 Charisma
Omega 50% effect on bonus of the set


In addition, the following hardwirings are worth considering in addition to or in place of the Talisman set:

Slot 6

  • Engineering - 'Squire' Energy Systems Operation EO-6##, +(1-6)% faster capacitor recharge. Most pilots who use cap warfare, especially on dedicated ships, will use cap boosters. As such, cap recharge rate becomes a minor factor in cap warfare.

Slot 7

  • Engineering - 'Squire' Energy Emission Systems ES-7##: -(1-6)% capacitor usage by cap warfare modules and energy transmitters. This implant has a significant impact on the capacitor usage of cap warfare modules. It however stacks with the Egress Port Maximizer rig.

Slot 8

  • Engineering - 'Squire' Energy Management EM-8##: +(1-6)% capacitor size. This implant is more useful than the EO-6##, but less than the ES-7##. A bigger capacitor is always useful.

Boosters

When approaching boosters from a capacitor warfare perspective, Mindflood is the drug of choice. This booster increases capacitor by a percentage that stacks on top of all other modifiers without stacking penalty.

Type Increases Cap by Side Effect Chance Side Effect Strength
Synth 6% 0% 0%
Standard 10% 20% 20%
Improved 15% 30% 25%
Strong 20% 40% 30%

The potential side effects are:

  • Shield Boost Amount
  • Armor Repair Amount
  • Turret Optimal Range Penalty
  • Missile Explosion Cloud Penalty

On drone boats like the Amarr Sentinel, Amarr Curse, and Amarr Pilgrim, the impact of these possible effects is usually minimal, as DPS usually comes from drones and many popular fits are buffer tanked only. The worst penalty is potentially the armor repair amount for a solo fit Sentinel or Pilgrim, although there are Curse fits that use missile launchers to up DPS.

Blood Raider ships using lasers and cap warfare mods may have more of a trade-off to consider. Individual pilots will have different risk assessments, but once the applicable skills have been trained (Icon skillbook2.png Neurotoxin Control and Icon skillbook2.png Neurotoxin Recovery), the risk and impact of side effects can be greatly reduced.

Rigs

The Egress Port Maximizer rigs decrease the capacitor use of all energy weapon modules. The Tech I rig reduces activation cost by 15%, and the Tech II by 20%. More than one rig can be used, but because of stacking penalties, the effects get lower as more rigs are added.

Capacitor warfare and PvE

Certain NPC Factions use Energy Neutralizers as their choice in electronic warfare. This means that capacitor warfare resistance is often not important in PvE, however for fighting certain factions (Blood Raiders, Sleepers, Triglavians, and the Amarr Empire in particular) it can become very important.

The use of Energy Neutralizers have an odd history in PvE. Traditionally, Neutralizers have had no effect on NPC ships, as most NPC ships do not use Capacitor to function; and Nosferatus have been of questionable use at best as NPCs had small capacitors and poor regeneration so using a Nosferatu as a backup energy source was generally ineffective. This applies to most common NPC ships found throughout all levels of K-Space and J-Space.

However, in the years since the Into The Abyss expansion (May, 2018), that story has changed. All NPC ships which have been introduced since the creation of Abyssal Deadspace, including the ships which are found inside the Abyss and all ships involved in the Triglavian Invasion, do use their Capacitors to power their electronic warfare and local and remote repair abilities, and thus are vulnerable to having energy neutralizers shut them down. (It is not known whether or not they also use capacitor to power their weapons or high-speed 'chase' mode.) These ships can also be used as Nosferatu targets for emergency capacitor sustain, as they themselves frequently bring neutralizers to drain players who would fight them.

Capacitor Warfare and PvP Ships

The following ships have some bonus related to Energy Neutralizers and Energy Nosferatu for range, drain amount, or efficiency:

Frigates

  • Blood Raider Cruor (Pirate faction frigate)
    • 15% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer drain amount per level of Icon skillbook2.png Amarr Frigate
    • Energy Nosferatus will drain energy from targets regardless of capacitor level
  • Amarr Sentinel (Electronic Attack Ship)
    • 20% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer drain amount per level of Icon skillbook2.png Amarr Frigate
    • 80% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer optimal range per level of Icon skillbook2.png Electronic Attack Ships
    • 40% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer falloff range per level of Icon skillbook2.png Electronic Attack Ships
  • Triglavian Collective Damavik, Triglavian Collective Nergal
    • 50% reduction to Energy Neutralizer capacitor cost

Destroyers

  • Amarr Dragoon (Destroyer)
    • 20% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer optimal range per level of Icon skillbook2.png Amarr Destroyer
    • 10% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer falloff range per level of Icon skillbook2.png Amarr Destroyer
  • Triglavian Collective Kikimora, Triglavian Collective Draugur
    • 50% reduction to Energy Neutralizer capacitor cost

Cruisers

  • Blood Raider Ashimmu (Pirate faction cruiser)
    • 15% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer drain amount per level of Icon skillbook2.png Amarr Cruiser
    • Energy Nosferatus will drain energy from targets regardless of capacitor level
  • Amarr Pilgrim (Recon Ship)
    • 10% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer drain amount per level of Icon skillbook2.png Recon Ships
    • 20% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer optimal range per level of Icon skillbook2.png Recon Ships
    • 10% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer falloff range per level of Icon skillbook2.png Recon Ships
  • Amarr Curse (Recon Ship)
    • 40% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer optimal range per level of Icon skillbook2.png Recon Ships
    • 20% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer falloff range per level of Icon skillbook2.png Recon Ships
    • 20% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer drain amount per level of Icon skillbook2.png Recon Ships
  • Amarr Legion (Strategic Cruiser, equipped with Energy Parasitic Complex Electronic Subsystem)
    • 10% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer drain amount per level of Icon skillbook2.png Amarr Core Systems
    • 10% bonus to the benefits of overheating Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer modules per level of Icon skillbook2.png Amarr Core Systems
  • Triglavian Collective Vedmak, Triglavian Collective Rodiva, Triglavian Collective Ikitursa, Triglavian Collective Zarmazd
    • 50% reduction to Energy Neutralizer capacitor cost

Battlecruisers

  • Triglavian Collective Drekavac
    • 50% reduction to Energy Neutralizer capacitor cost

Battleships

  • Amarr Armageddon (Battleship)
    • 10% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer optimal range per level of Icon skillbook2.png Amarr Battleship
    • 5% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer falloff range per level of Icon skillbook2.png Amarr Battleship
  • Blood Raider Bhaalgorn (Pirate faction battleship)
    • 15% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer drain amount per level of Icon skillbook2.png Amarr Battleship
    • Energy Nosferatus will drain energy from targets regardless of capacitor level
  • Triglavian Collective Leshak
    • 50% reduction to Energy Neutralizer capacitor cost

Capital Ships

  • Blood Raider Chemosh
    • 15% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer drain amount per level of Icon skillbook2.png Amarr Dreadnought
    • Energy Nosferatus will drain energy from targets regardless of capacitor level
  • Triglavian Collective Zirnitra
    • 50% reduction to Energy Neutralizer capacitor cost
  • Blood Raider Dagon
    • 20% bonus to Energy Nosferatu drain amount, optimal range, and falloff range, per level of Icon skillbook2.png Amarr Carrier
    • Energy Nosferatus will drain energy from targets regardless of capacitor level
  • Blood Raider Molok
    • 15% bonus to Energy Nosferatu and Energy Neutralizer drain amount per level of Icon skillbook2.png Amarr Titan
    • Energy Nosferatus will drain energy from targets regardless of capacitor level

Unbonused ships

A number of ships fitted for cap warfare are not bonused for it. The Gallente Dominix and the Amarr Prophecy are well known examples of ships with no bonus to cap warfare range or transfer amount which have been used with great effect. While any ship could conceivably be fitted with a neutralizer or a nos, the following elements help make an unbonused ship suitable for cap warfare:

  • Free high slots. The ship needs a place to fit the modules.
  • Drone capacity. When using high slots for neuts, pilots have to rely on drones for damage. A drone damage bonus is also helpful.
  • Powergrid. Neuts cost a lot of powergrid to install.
  • Capacitor size. Neuts cost a lot of cap to run, and a ship with a big capacitor will be easier to fight with.
  • Tank. Neutralizers and Nosferatus have short ranges, so pilots will need to be close to their target, and will thus be more vulnerable to damage.
  • Range. In an unbonused ship, you need to be be close to your target to use cap warfare modules. Don't mix cap warfare modules with long range modules such as ewar.

Frigates

  • The Amarr Punisher is often flown with a utility cap warfare module.
  • Many solo fits for frigates use a small cap wafare module.

Destroyers

  • Except for the Amarr Dragoon (see above), destroyers are not usually used for cap warfare.

Cruisers

  • The Amarr Arbitrator is usually flown with cap warfare modules. Its tank is not that great but it has a nice drone damage bonus.
  • The Amarr Maller can be used as a surprise neuting cruiser. It won't have any dps to speak of, but can fit a point, a scram or a web while being cap stable and have more than 50K EHP.
  • The Minmatar Rupture is often flown with a utility cap warfare module.
  • The Sisters of EVE Stratios, when used as a covert hunting ship (usually in Wormhole space), is often fit with 3 Neutralizers (alongside its probe launcher, cloak, and large Drone bay).

Battlecruisers

  • The Amarr Prophecy can be effectively fitted with capacitor warfare modules in its high slots. It has a good tank, capacitor and with good drone skills a reasonable amount of dps.
  • Brawling MinmatarHurricanes are often flown with a utility cap warfare module.

Battleships

  • The Gallente Dominix is often used a cap warfare ship. Its great drone bonus makes it ideal as a close range cap warfare ship.
  • Brawling MinmatarTyphoons are often flown with a utility cap warfare module.
  • MinmatarTempests are often flown with a utility cap warfare module.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.eveuniversity.org/index.php?title=Capacitor_warfare&oldid=214001"